Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-stage vs two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection: a call for a prospective randomized trial

Study

No. of subjects

Country

Period of surgery

Participants

Design

Minimal follow-up

Part of component removed

Failure /reinfection definition

Statistical analysis

Outcomes

Age

NOS Scores

PJI definition

Criteria for select

Single-stage

Two-stage

Single-stage

Two-stage

  

Single-stage

Two-stage

Baker 2013 [5]

33

89

UK

2008-2010

Infected TKA

Retrospective cohort

6 (6-12) M

NA

NA

Yes

Reoperation, knee score, satisfaction

69.4 ± 10.7

70.3 ± 8.9

8

NA

NA

NA

Bauer 2006 [13]

30

77

France

NA

Infected TKA

Retrospective cohort

2 Y

NA

NA

Yes

Reinfection rate, knee score

71.8

68.3

8

Multiple sample germs

NA

NA

Betsch 2008 [14]

4

51

Switzerland

1995-2004

PJI (Hip and Knee)

Retrospective cohort

24 M

Infected prosthesis

Yes

Yes

Failure rate

67.1 ± 11.7

9

Sinus tract, positive cultures, tissue neutrophils, or pus hint infection

NA

NA

Castellani 2017 [15]

35

75

Canada

2000-2013

PJI (Hip and Knee)

Retrospective cohort

12 M

Components

Yes

Yes

Failure rate

68

63

9

Visible infection signs, positive cultures, or pre-op sinus tract

NA

NA

Chalmers 2020 [16]

1

4

USA

2009-2017

PJI following UKA

Retrospective cohort

1 (1-9) Y

All components

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation

51-87

9

MSIS

NA

NA

Choi 2013 [17]

17

44

USA

1999-2009

Infected THA

Retrospective cohort

12 (12-132) M

All components

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, hip score

NA

NA

9

MSIS

Based on patient specifics and surgical conditions

Crego 2019 [18]

20

45

Germany

NA

PJI (Knee)

Retrospective cohort

NA

NA

NA

Yes

Reinfection, hip score

NA

NA

9

NA

NA

NA

Cristea 2007 [19]

10

25

Romania

1990-2004

PJI (Hip and Knee)

Retrospective cohort

NA

NA

NA

Yes

Reinfection

NA

N

6

Positive cultures

NA

NA

Cury 2015 [20]

6

7

Brazil

2008-2010

PJI after TKA

Retrospective cohort

NA

NA

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, life scores

NA

NA

6

NA

Good skin condition, no major health issues, and antibiotic-sensitive

Poor skin and tissue conditions

Engesater 2011 [21]

501

283

Norway

1987-2009

Infected THA

Retrospective cohort

NA

All or partial components

NA

Yes

Reoperation

71.5

71

8

NA

NA

NA

Gao 2008 [22]

10

5

China

1999-2005

Infected THAs

Retrospective cohort

12 (12-31) M

All components

NA

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation, hip score

54-71

6

NA

NA

NA

Haddad 2015 [23]

28

74

UK

2004-2009

Chronic infected TKA

Retrospective cohort

3 (3-9) Y

All components

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation, knee score

63 (48-87)

68 (45-85)

7

Same microorganism in 3+ surgical samples from different sites.

(1) minimal bone or soft tissue loss, (2) non-immunosuppressed patients without ongoing sepsis or chronic diseases, (3) isolated low-virulent pre-op organism sensitive to antibiotics. Excluded polymicrobial or multi-resistant infections like MRSA/MRSE. Decision after discussing with microbiologists.

Contraindications present in single-stage

Hope 1989 [24]

72

19

UK

1976-1987

Coagulase-negative staphylococci infected THA

Retrospective cohort

2 (2-121) M

All components

NA

Yes

Failure rate

64 (30-85)

65 (41-81)

8

Diagnosed clinically, hematologically, through imaging, and samples from joint and prosthetic tissues

NA

NA

Jacquot 2015 [25]

5

14

France

1996-2011

Infected RSA

Retrospective cohort

12 (12-137) M

NA

NA

Yes

Reinfection, complication rate

71 (55-83)

7

MSIS

By the surgeon, considering the patient’s age and comorbidities,

surgical history, infection characteristics, and bone or soft tissue

defects.

Kheir 2017 [27]

11

43

USA

1991-2014

Enterococcal PJI (Knee and Hip)

Retrospective cohort

12 M

NA

Yes

Yes

Failure rate

66.3 (39-85)

9

MSIS

NA

NA

Klemt 2021 [9]

44

88

USA

2015-2018

Chronic PJI (Knee)

Retrospective cohort

NA

NA

NA

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation, readmission, patient-reported outcome measures

64.9 ± 9.2

65.4 ± 8.6

8

MSIS

Microorganism with low virulence, patient in good health without immunocompromising systemic conditions, absence of any septic focus, implant loosening, limited soft-tissue defect or condition that impedes direct closure of wound after revision surgery

Major tissue or bone loss, implant looseness, reinfection, resistant/unidentified germs

Klouche 2012 [28]

38

46

France

2002-2006

PJI (Hip)

Prospective non-randomised study

24 (24-68) M

All components

Yes

Yes

Reinfection

63.60 ± 14.8

66.87 ± 12.1

7

Positive cultures

Surgeon knew germ pre-exchange, deemed bone loss minor pre-op and during surgery post-component removal

No pre-op microbe diagnosis, major bone loss

Laffer 2006 [29]

2

13

Switzerland

1988-2003

PJI after TKA

Retrospective cohort

2 (2-193) M

NA

Yes

Yes

Success rate

70.1 (43.5–90.1)

8

Sinus tract to joint or two of: positive tissue/fluid culture, high neutrophils, high leukocytes, clinical signs, or radiological infection signs

NA

NA

Larsson 2018 [30]

9

46

Switzerland

2008-2012

PJI (Hip)

Retrospective cohort

12 (12-60) M

NA

Yes

Yes

Success rate

67 (31-90)

8

Consensus Meeting on Periprosthetic Joint Infection

NA

NA

Lecuire 1999 [31]

16

41

French

NA

Infected THA

Retrospective cohort

6.6 Y (mean)

NA

NA

NA

Reinfection, hip score

NA

NA

6

NA

NA

NA

Lemmens 2021 [32]

1

16

Belgium

2004-2018

Infected primary or revision RSA

Retrospective cohort

24 (24-132) M

NA

Yes

NA

Reinfection, functional outcome

66.8 (44-81)

8

International

Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections

Personalized based on bone health, age, overall health, expectations, and compliance, chosen at the surgeon's discretion

Lenguerrand 2022 [7]

489

2377

International multicenter

2003-2014

Infected primary knee arthroplasty

Retrospective cohort

NA

NA

Yes

Yes

Reoperation

68 ± 10

69 ± 9

9

NA

NA

NA

Leta 2019 [33]

72

243

Norway

1994-2016

PJI after primary TKA

Retrospective cohort

1 Y

NA

NA

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation, survival rate, mortality rate

69 ± 9.5

69 ± 9.7

9

Based on the assessment of PJI and the clinical picture

NA

NA

Li 2017 [34]

22

105

China

2003-2014

Infected revision TKA

Retrospective cohort

12 (12-158) M

Infected prostheses

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, complication

64.4 ± 9.5

9

MSIS

Confirmed effective antibiotic treatment

Widespread infection symptoms with unclear cultures or resistant organisms or sinus tracts detected beforehand

Mahieu 2019 [35]

15

17

France

2010-2012

Streptococcal PJI (Knee and Hip)

Retrospective cohort

24 M

NA

NA

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation

77 (69–83)

7

IDSA

Based on center expertise, with no bone reconstruction needed, healthy soft tissue, and specific microorganism identification

All other situations

Massin 2016 [36]

108

177

France

2005-2010

Infected TKA

Retrospective cohort

2 Y

NA

NA

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation, knee score,

71 (63–76)

67 (59–73)

8

Sinus tract to joint or two of: positive tissue/fluid culture, high neutrophils, high leukocytes, clinical signs, or radiological infection signs

NA

NA

Matar 2021 [8]

82

210

UK

2003-2018

Chronic PJI (Knee)

Retrospective cohort

2 (2-17.6) Y

NA

Yes

Yes

Success rate, survivorship rate

71.8 ± 9.8

70.5 ± 10.2

8

MSIS

Single organism infection, known sensitivities, healthy immune system, intact soft tissues, and no systemic sepsis or draining sinus indicated suitability

NA

Ribes 2019 [6]

21

41

France

2009-2014

Chronic infected TKA

Retrospective cohort

1 Y

NA

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, knee score,

72.6 ± 9.2

69.5 ± 9.1

9

IDSA

Two-stage replacement was preferred when: unknown cause; resistant bacteria to effective antibiotics; skin or fistula issues hindering closure; significant pus risking new prosthesis contamination; substantial bone defects needing grafting.

Ritter 2010 [37]

8

68

Indiana

1969-2004

PJI (Knee and Hip)

Retrospective cohort

1 Y

NA

Yes

Yes

Success rate

65.4 ± 12.2

9

NA

NA

NA

Siddiqi 2019 [38]

57

137

USA

2012-2017

Chronic PJI after primary TKA

Retrospective cohort

2 Y

NA

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, reimplantation, reoperation rates, success rate

NA

NA

9

MSIS

NA

NA

Sotiriou 2022 [39]

6

42

Sweden

2002-2016

PJI after THA

Retrospective cohort

2 Y

NA

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation, operating time, hospital stay, blood loss, hip score

73 ± 11.8

68 ± 10.8

9

History, physical exam, sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and bacterial cultures (joint fluid aspiration or biopsy)

NA

NA

Stone 2017 [40]

60

29

USA

2004-2012

PJI (Shoulder)

Retrospective cohort

12 (12-105) M

All or partial components

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation, complication, functional outcome

69 (30-92)

65 (27-73)

9

Combining previous infection history, physical signs (like skin changes, swelling, draining sinus), lab tests (white cell count, sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein), and positive intraoperative findings (like pus, specific cell count in frozen sections, and cultures).

NA

NA

Svensson 2019 [41]

404

1250

Sweden

1979-2015

Infected primary THA

Retrospective cohort

8.6 Y (mean)

All components

NA

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation, survival rate,aseptic loosening

70 ± 10

68 ± 10

8

NA

NA

NA

Tirumala 2021 [42]

46

92

USA

2014-2018

Chronic PJI (Hip)

Retrospective cohort

17.8 M (mean)

All components

NA

Yes

Reinfection, reooperation, mortality rate, functional outcome

68.88 ± 9.47

68.17 ± 8.28

9

MSIS and ICM

A mild microorganism infection in a healthy patient without immune system issues, with no visible infection site or implant issues

Severe soft tissue or bone damage, implant looseness, reinfection, resistant or unknown organisms

Tuecking 2021 [43]

15

48

Germany

2013-2019

Late-onset PJI (Knee)

Retrospective cohort

18 (18-92) M

NA

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation, implant survival

65.0 ± 10.2

69.3 ± 11.1

9

EBJIS

NA

NA

Van den Kieboom 2021 [44]

30

75

USA

2010-2018

Chronic culture-negative PJI (Knee and Hip)

Retrospective cohort

2.5 (2.5-22.9) Y

NA

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, reoperation, amputation, readmission, mortality, hospital stay

67.9 ± 10.6

65.0 ± 11.0

9

MSIS

NA

NA

Van Dijk 2022 [45]

21

107

Netherlands

2010-2017

PJI (Knee and Hip)

Retrospective cohort

4 Y

Infected prosthesis

Yes

Yes

Reinfection, survival rate

72 (55-92)

70 (44–92)

9

MSIS

Good for infections with effective antibiotics, not for severe systemic infections or when the organism isn't known before surgery or if there's significant soft tissue involvement needing flap coverage

NA

Wolf 2014 [46]

37

55

Austria

1985-2004

Infected THA

Retrospective cohort

2 Y

NA

NA

Yes

Reinfection

67

60.4

9

Signs include high white blood cells, increased CRP, redness, swelling, warmth, fluid aspiration, and positive microbiology

NA

NA

Wouthuyzen-Bakker 2019 [47]

20

78

International multicenter

2005-2015

Late acute PJI (Hip and Knee)

Retrospective cohort

10 (10-55) M

All components

Yes

Yes

Failure rate

NA

NA

9

MSIS

NA

NA

Xu 2022 [48]

13

36

China

2012-2017

PJI (Hip and Knee)

Retrospective case-control

2 Y

NA

Yes

Yes

Success rate, complication, remission rate

63.6

9

NA

NA

NA

  1. PJI periprosthetic joint infection, TKA total knee arthroplasty, THA total hip arthroplasty, RSA Reversed shoulder arthroplasty, NOS Newcastle–Ottawa scale, M month, Y year, NA Not applicable, MSIS Musculoskeletal Infection Society, IDSA Infectious Diseases Society of America, ICM International Consensus Meeting, EBJIS European Bone and Joint Infection Society