Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of pre-operative demographics and clinical status among the groups

From: Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial

 

Measured resection (n = 51)

Tensor (n = 50)

Block (n = 52)

p-value

Gender (M/F)

2/49

1/49

2/50

0.828a

Agec (year)

68.6 (55–81)

70.8 (56–86)

69.3 (56–78)

0.178b

Body mass indexc (kg/m2)

26.6 (20.8–33.7)

25.6 (20.7–31.2)

25.8 (20.2–33.3)

0.169b

Involved knee (Rt./Lt.)

27/24

21/29

25/27

0.545a

Range of knee motionc (degree)

 Flexion contracture

9.4 (0–25)

8.8 (0–30)

8.8 (0–20)

0.859b

 Further flexion

124.7 (100–150)

125.9 (90–150)

125.5 (40–150)

0.937b

 Total range of motion

115.3 (80–145)

117.1 (60–145)

116.7 (35–145)

0.889b

Tibiofemoral angle (degree)

Varus 4.5 (varus 24 - valgus 7)

Varus 2.8 (varus 19 - valgus 6)

Varus 2.9 (varus 18 - valgus 7)

0.225b

KS scorec (points)

 Knee

48.6 (19–90)

45.1 (6–74)

46.6 (24–71)

0.259b

 Function

42.7 (0–86)

39.7 (0–71)

39.4 (2–71)

0.163b

HSS score (points)

62.2 (38–84)

60.9 (27–82)

61.9 (43–78)

0.802b

WOMAC score (points)

52.8 (19–96)

58.3 (17–96)

55.8 (17–91)

0.094b

  1. Abbreviations: KS Knee Society, HSS Hospital for Special Surgery, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (LK 3.1 version)
  2. aChi-square test
  3. bMixed model for adjustment of auto-correlation
  4. cThe values are given as the mean and the range in parenthesis