Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of alignment parameters among different trochlear types

From: Do size, shape, and alignment parameters of the femoral condyle affect the trochlear groove tracking? A morphometric study based on 3D- computed tomography models in Chinese people

 

Type 45°

Type 60°

Type 75°

Type 90°

p-value

KVPA,°

5.1 (0.7)

5.1 (0.9)

5.1 (0.9)

4.4 (1.0)

p1* = 0.017

p2* = 0.004

p3* = 0.001

mMDFA,°

94.0 (1.2)

93.3 (2.1)

94.3 (2.0)

95.0 (1.6)

p4* = 0.031

p5* = 0.008

p6* = 0.001

HKA,°

179.8 (2.3)

179.3 (2.1)

179.6 (2.5)

181.3 (2.5)

p7* = 0.049

p8* = 0.001

p9* = 0.004

  1. All parameter values are reported as mean (standard deviation)
  2. KVPA knee valgus physiologic angle, mMDFA mechanical medial distal femoral angle, HKA hip-knee-ankle angle
  3. *There were significant differences when comparing type 90° with types 45° (p1, p4, p7), 60° (p2, p5, p8), and 75° (p3, p6, p9) in terms of KVPA, mMDFA, and HKA, respectively