Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of all included studies (Alphabetically ordered)

From: The efficacy of duloxetine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids in osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Study

Treatment

n

Mean age (yrs)

Baseline WOMAC score (SD)

Change from baseline WOMAC score (SD)

Percentage women

Duration OA at baseline (yrs)

Flare required

Concomitant analgesic allowedd

OA site

Abou-Raya et al. 2012 [49]b

Duloxetine

144

68.9

50.63 (9.56)

-12.40 (14.02)

16

5.7

No

Yes

Knee

 

Placebo

144

68.5

50.94 (9.47)

-3.96 (15.24)

17

5.6

   

Afilalo et al. 2010 [50]f

Oxycodone 40–100 mg

342

58.2

 

-27.50 (21.75)

59

 

No

Not mentioned

Knee

Study NCT00421928

Placebo

337

58.2

 

-22.50 (21.00)

59

    

Baerwald et al. 2010 [51]b

Naproxen 1000 mg

156

62.26

 

-22.54 (20.40)

32.1

 

Yes

No

Hip

 

Placebo

331

63.29

 

-14.80 (22.27)

37.2

    

Bensen et al. 1999 [52]

Celecoxib 200 mg

202

63

53.13 (17.08)

-12.50 (18.06)

72

9

No

No

Knee

 

Naproxen 1000 mg

198

62

55.10 (14.58)

-12.40 (18.91)

71

10

   
 

Placebo

203

62

53.85 (15.42)

-6.35 (16.18)

75

11

   

Bingham et al. 2007a [53]

Etoricoxib 30 mg

231

62.1

65.40 (13.03)

-24.37 (21.37)

66.2

 

Yes

No

Hip/knee

 

Celecoxib 200 mg

241

62.5

66.20 (13.24)

-22.21 (21.66)a

69.7

    
 

Placebo

127

62.8

64.67 (13.30)

-10.98 (22.14)a

65.4

    

Bingham et al. 2007b [53]

Etoricoxib 30 mg

244

61.9

67.23 (13.24)

-24.37 (22.19)

69.7

 

Yes

No

Hip/knee

 

Celecoxib 200 mg

247

62.2

65.59 (14.59)

-23.19 (23.29)a

61.9

    
 

Placebo

117

60.9

64.98 (13.81)

-12.29 (22.63)a

65

    

Boswell et al. 2008 [54]

Celecoxib 200 mg

185

59.7

63.55 (14.70)

-23.46 (24.51)a

67

8.8

No

No

Knee

 

Placebo

186

60.5

63.37 (13.68)

-18.46 (23.46)a

73

8

   

Burch et al. 2007 [55]f

Tramadol 200–300 mg

432

62

 

34.96 (14.74)g

64

 

Yes

No

Knee

Study NCT00833794

Placebo

214

62

 

35.20 (15.13)g

62

    

Chappell et al. 2011 [26]b

Duloxetine 60–120 mg

128

63.16

51.63 (10.45)

-20.50 (11.87)

70

8.14

No

Yes

Knee

Study NCT00433290

Placebo

128

61.9

53.82 (9.04)

-16.25 (12.26)

84

6.74

   

Chappell et al. 2009 [27]b

Duloxetine 60–120 mg

111

62.07

57.10 (12.15)

-24.01 (16.07)

63.06

9.04

No

Yes

Knee

Study NCT00408421

Placebo

120

62.48

56.51 (11.12)

-16.81 (13.67)

67.5

9.3

   

Clegg et al. 2006 [56]b, e

Celecoxib 200 mg

318

59.4

47.10 (13.36)

-17.95 (14.98)

66.7

10.1

No

Yes

Knee

 

Placebo

313

58.2

46.23 (13.49)

-14.58 (15.99)

63.9

9.5

   

DeLemos et al. 2011 [57]

Tramadol 200 mg

199

62

61.13 (14.02)

-16.24 (24.22)

62.3

8.5

No

No

Hip/knee

 

Tramadol 300 mg

199

59.7

60.37 (15.93)

-22.10 (24.16)

61.8

7.6

   
 

Celecoxib 200 mg

202

60

58.21 (15.26)

-25.60 (24.58)

64.9

8

   
 

Placebo

200

58.9

59.95 (15.49)

-17.73 (24.28)

68.5

7.8

   

Essex et al. 2012 [58]c

Celecoxib 200 mg

296

60

56.15 (15.42)

-23.13 (19.71)

64.9

7.2

Yes

No

Knee

 

Naproxen 1000 mg

293

60.7

56.56 (15.73)

-23.54 (19.61)

67.6

8.5

   

Fishman et al. 2007 [59]

Tramadol 200 mg

107

61

58.42 (13.99)

-24.39 (21.19)a

59.8

 

No

Yes

Knee

 

Tramadol 300 mg

105

60

63.74 (15.21)

-25.54 (44.61)

65.7

    
 

Placebo

224

61

61.29 (14.16)

-18.82 (38.32)

61.6

    

Fleischmann et al. 2006 [60]b

Celecoxib 200 mg

444

61.3

50.94 (16.76)

-16.67 (18.95)

67.1

6.7

No

No

Knee

 

Placebo

231

61.5

48.65 (16.97)

-9.69 (16.82)

66.2

6.6

   

Fleischmann et al. 2001 [61]b

Tramadol 200–400 mg

63

62.52

 

41.60 (20.50)g

65.1

7.94

Yes

No

Knee

 

Placebo

66

62.45

 

50.40 (22.50)g

59.1

7.76

   

Gana et al. 2006 [36]

Tramadol 200 mg

201

59.1

63.77 (13.14)

-21.25 (23.92)

63.7

7.7

No

No

Hip/knee

 

Tramadol 300 mg

201

58.5

60.10 (14.73)

-20.27 (23.81)

59.2

8

   
 

Placebo

205

56.4

61.82 (14.82)

-14.19 (23.45)

68.8

7.7

   

Hochberg et al. 2011a [62]

Celcoxib 200 mg

242

33.2

 

-5.56 (40.51)a, h

61.2

 

Yes

Yes

Knee

 

Placebo

124

32.7

  

66.1

    

Hochberg et al. 2011b [62]

Celecoxib 200 mg

244

33

 

-4.36 (41.89)a, h

62.7

   

Knee

 

Placebo

122

33

  

63.1

    

Kivitz et al. 2002 [63]

Naproxen 1000 mg

205

60.4

55.91

-18.79 (19.78)

63

9.4

No

No

Knee

 

Placebo

205

60.3

55.72

-14.04 (19.71)

64

8.3

   

Kivitz et al. 2001 [64]

Celecoxib 200 mg

207

62

52.29 (16.73)

-10.10 (15.92)

65

7.2

Yes

No

Hip

 

Naproxen 1000 mg

207

64

51.88 (17.24)

-11.98 (16.07)

66

7.3

   
 

Placebo

218

64

52.81 (15.60)

-4.38 (15.70)

67

7.9

   

Lehmann et al. 2005 [65]b

Celecoxib 200 mg

420

62.9

52.60 (14.93)

-15.31 (16.47)

68.3

4.4

Yes

yes

Knee

 

Placebo

424

61.7

51.77 (15.09)

-11.77 (19.03)

71.9

3.9

   

Leung et al. 2002 [66]

Etoricoxib 60 mg

224

62.93

63.84 (13.89)

-22.19 (15.91)

77.2

5.88

Yes

No

Hip/knee

 

Naproxen 1000 mg

221

63.16

63.76 (13.36)

-21.91 (15.81)

78.3

6.25

   
 

Placebo

56

64.09

68.11 (10.83)

-13.26 (15.17)

82.1

6.3

   

Markenson et al. 2005 [67]b, e

Oxycodone 10–120 mg

56

62

64.70 (15.71)a

-14.93 (26.09)

68

 

No

Yes

Hip/knee/spine/other

 

Placebo

51

64

63.80 (15.00)

-0.87 (19.72)

78

    

Puopolo et al. 2007 [68]

Etoricoxib 30 mg

224

62.1

64.95

-24.90 (23.14)

77.7

6.6

Yes

Yes

Hip/knee

 

Ibuprofen 2400 mg

213

62.3

63.18

-21.73 (22.49)

73.7

6.7

   
 

Placebo

111

64

64.56

-14.43 (21.23)

75.7

6.5

   

Rauck et al. 2013 [69]

Hydromorphone 16 mg

330

59.5

 

-17.00 (19.98)

64.2

 

No

Yes

Hip/knee

 

Placebo

331

60

 

-13.00 (20.01)

63

    

Schnitzer et al. 2011 [70]b

Celecoxib 200 mg

419

61.7

54.90 (14.49)

-16.58 (15.24)a

61.3

3.7

No

No

Hip

 

Placebo

416

61.4

54.58 (15.11)

-10.62 (13.83)a

60.6

3.8

   

Schnitzer et al. 2011 [71]b

Naproxen 1000 mg

254

60

 

-26.29 (18.71)a

70.5

 

Yes

No

Knee

 

Placebo

257

60.15

 

-16.04 (18.62)a

72.65

    

Schnitzer et al. 2010 [72]b

Naproxen 1000 mg

227

61.1

70.08 (12.98)

-33.33 (20.23)a

67.4

 

Yes

No

Knee

 

Placebo

221

61

69.85 (13.12)

-20.42 (20.17)a

71.9

    

Sheldon et al. 2005 [73]b

Celecoxib 200 mg

393

60.2

54.79 (15.45)

-16.25 (19.08)

63.1

6.7

No

No

Knee

 

Placebo

382

60.8

55.31 (14.36)

-9.90 (17.01)

61.3

7

   

Sowers et al. 2005 [74]c

Celecoxib 200 mg

136

61.8

46.20 (22.16)

-16.30 (20.99)

62

 

No

No

Hip/knee

 

Naproxen 1000 mg

128

63.6

51.40 (20.36)

-14.70 (21.50)

60

    

Tannenbaum et al. 2004 [75]b

Celecoxib 200 mg

481

64.1

50.73 (16.04)

-13.96 (16.46)

69.2

5.3

No

No

Knee

 

Placebo

243

64.6

51.25 (14.58)

-9.79 (16.77)

67.1

4.3

   

Vojtassak et al. 2011 [76]

Hydromorphone

138

65

60.00 (10.11)

-17.75 (14.62)

77

 

No

Yes

Hip/knee

 

Placebo

149

66

57.92 (10.36)

-17.69 (15.79)

68

    

Wiesenhutter et al. 2005 [77]

Etoricoxib 30 mg

214

63.1

68.68 (16.64)

-24.52 (22.97)

70.1

7.9

Yes

No

Hip/Knee

 

Ibuprofen 2400 mg

210

61.3

68.13 (17.02)

-23.65 (23.13)

70

8.2

   
 

Placebo

104

59.5

69.71 (16.52)

-14.20 (20.24)

72.1

6.9

   
  1. Note: avalue imputed by estimating a stiffness subscore from other scores reported for that treatment; bstudy longer than 12 weeks duration; cincluded in Bayesian analysis only, no placebo arm, dwashout is not considered as complete in studies with concomitant analgesic use; edenotes studies without a washout period; fdenotes studies with enriched enrollment design; gindicates endpoint WOMAC score, change from baseline not available in these studies; hindicates difference from placebo in WOMAC score change from baseline.