Skip to main content

Table 5 Change in CDI among knees with and without structural progression

From: Development of a rapid knee cartilage damage quantification method using magnetic resonance images

 

Joint Space Narrowing (JSN)

 

No structural progression

Structural progression

p-value

 

n

Mean

SD

SRM

n

Mean

SD

SRM

 

Femur CDI (Change)

74

−35.73

50.14

−0.71

25

−87.82

68.62

−1.28

<0.0001

Tibia CDI (Change)

74

−10.86

23.99

−0.45

25

−63.83

46.02

−1.39

<0.0001

Tibiofemoral CDI (Change)

74

−46.58

57.48

−0.81

25

−151.7

90.95

−1.67

<0.0001

 

Kellgren-Lawrence (KL)

 

No structural progression

Structural progression

p-value

 

n

Mean

SD

SRM

n

Mean

SD

SRM

 

Femur CDI (Change)

58

−40.53

49.84

−0.81

39

−64.06

70.06

−0.91

0.060

Tibia CDI (Change)

58

−15.86

33.21

−0.48

39

−37.23

43.34

−0.86

0.007

Tibiofemoral CDI (Change)

58

−56.39

64.12

−0.88

39

−101.3

96.68

−1.05

0.007

  1. Notes: Structural Progression, JSN/KL has different grade at baseline and follow- up; N = number of knees (the numbers were excluded JSN = 3 and KL = 4 since both of them are the highest grade, no grade change happens); SD = standard deviation; SRM = standardized response mean.