Skip to main content

Table 3 Agreement and reliability indices of objective or patient-reported outcome measures

From: Minimal detectable change for mobility and patient-reported tools in people with osteoarthritis awaiting arthroplasty

 

Week 1 mean (sd)

Week 2 mean (sd)

Difference mean (sd)

SEM (95% CI)

90% confidence in score

MDC90

MDC95

CV%

Knee

        

6MWT (m) n = 72

344.9 (105.6)

348.4 (102.3)

-3.5 (40.3)

28.5 (24.5 to 34.1)

46.9

66.3

79.0

8

TUG* (s), n = 74

12.7 (4.7)

13.1 (5.4)

-0.4 (3.7)

NA

NA

±30.8%

±36.7%

13

VAS Pain (cm), n = 71

6.8 (2.0)

6.8 (1.9)

0.1 (1.6)

1.0 (0.9 to 1.2)

1.7

2.4

2.8

15

KOOS, n = 68

        

Pain

39.0 (18.7)

36.7 (18.2)

2.3 (10.3)

7.3 (6.2 to 8.8)

12.0

17.0

20.2

19

Symptoms

38.8 (19.2)

39.1 (18.8)

-0.4 (12.3)

8.7 (7.4 to 10.5)

40.0

20.2

24.1

22

ADL

43.8 (18.6)

40.2 (19.1)

3.6 (10.6)#

7.5 (6.4 to 9.0)

12.3

17.4

20.8

17

QOL

21.7 (7.7)

23.8 (18.8)

-2.7 (13.8)

9.6 (8.2 to 11.6)

15.9

22.4

26.6

44

Hip

        

6MWT (m), n = 54

339.8 (107.8)

347.3 (105.3)

-7.5 (41.6)

29.4 (24.7 to 36.3)

57.7

68.5

81.5

9

TUG* ( s), n = 56

14.0 (7.2)

13.8 (6.6)

0.13 (3.6)

NA

NA

±37.5%

±44.6%

16

VAS Pain (cm), n = 58

7.1 (2.3)

6.8 (1.9)

0.4 (1.6)

1.2 (1.0 to 1.4)

1.9

2.7

3.3

17

HOOS, n = 56

        

Pain

36.0 (20.9)

34.4 (20.6)

1.6 (11.0)

7.8 (6.6 to 9.6)

12.8

18.1

21.6

22

Symptoms

42.7 (19.4)

38.1 (21.8)

4.6 (11.6)#

8.2 (6.9 to 10.1)

13.5

19.2

22.7

19

ADL

36.7 (20.9)

34.9 (19.7)

1.8 (9.0)

6.4 (5.4 to 7.8)

10.5

14.8

17.7

17

QOL

20.4 (20.2)

21.8 (21.6)

-1.4 (12.5)

8.8 (7.5 to 10.9)

14.6

20.6

24.4

43

  1. Key: SEM, standard error of measurement with 95% confidence level; MDC90 and MDC95, minimal detectable change at the 90% and 95% confidence level; CV%, co-efficient of variation per cent; 6MWT, six-minute walk test; TUG, timed up-and-go; VAS, visual analogue scale; KOOS, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; HOOS, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; ADL, activities of daily living; QOL, quality of life; NA, not applicable (The SEM for TUG is not provided as it is not derived using the same formula due to its skewed distribution); *TUG data were log-transformed - the corresponding MDC90 and MDC95 are then interpreted as 90% and 95% of the measurements being within a ratio of the original measurement. Note, average Week 1 6MWT above slightly differs from average Week 1 reported for the comparison between practise and official Week 1 as people who did not have a practise test are included in the average for Week 1 above; #, significantly different, p < 0.05.