Skip to main content

Table 3 Mean (95% CI) scores and treatment effect (differences between baseline and post-treatment, 3weeks after intervention) *

From: Effects of a one week multidisciplinary inpatient self-management programme for patients with fibromyalgia: a randomised controlled trial

 

SMP group

Control group

Treatment effect (95 CI)

P value

Effect size§

Primary outcomes:

Psychological distress (GHQ20) (0 - 60, 0 =no distress)

0.552

 

Baseline

27.0 (11.0-57.2)

26.4 (10.0-50.2)

  

Post-treatment

25.0 ( 6.0-49.1)

24.6 (10.0-57.2)

0.96 (-2.2 to 4.1)

 

0.10

Effective Musculoskeletal Consumer Scale (EC-17) (0 -100 , 0= never, 100 =always)

0.016

 

Baseline

57.5 (22.1-88.2)

54.3 (0.0-86.8)

  

Post-treatment

63.0 (36.8-97.1)

56.8 (1.5-100)

4.26 (0.8 to 7.7)

 

0.24

Secondary outcomes:

    

Self-efficacy pain (10 - 100, 100 = high SE)

0.387

 

Baseline

50.6 (18.0-82.0)

51.4 (10.0-98.0)

  

Post-treatment

54.8 (16.0-94.0)

52.3 (10.0-82.0)

-1.83 (-6.0 to 2.3)

 

0.12

Self-efficacy symptoms (10 - 100, 100 = high SE)

0.189

 

Baseline

57.8 (20.0-93.3)

57.7 (11.7-86.7)

  

Post-treatment

61.4 (35.0-91.7)

57.9 (23.3-90.0)

2.63 (-1.3 to 6.6)

 

0.20

Self –efficacy function (10-100, 100 = high SE)

0.556

 

Baseline

77.9 (22.2-100.0)

74.7 (18.9-100.0)

  

Post-treatment

77.9 (32.2-100.0)

72.8 (16.7-100.0)

1.02 (-2.4 to 4.4)

 

0.06

Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (0-10, 0 = low impact)

0.265

 

Baseline

59.0 (16.1-89.6)

59.7 (23.9-92.5)

  

Post-treatment

55.9 (7.0-90.5)

61.0 (23.2-93.2)

-2.76 (-7.7 to 2.1)

 

0.15

  1. *Adjusted for gender, education, marital status and currently employed (Yes/No).
  2. §Effect sizes were calculated between-group difference divided by the pooled SD of the baseline scores.
  3. (<0.2 trivial; 0.2-0.49, small, 0.5-0.79, moderate, ≥80, large).
  4. GHQ20, General Health Questionnaire, SMP, Self-management programme.