Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodological quality of studies on medical diagnostic agreement and accuracy, triaging agreement of potential orthopaedic surgical candidates or clinical recommendations between physiotherapists in advanced practice physiotherapy and physicians

From: Advanced practice physiotherapy in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review

Study

MacKay et al. 2009

O'Donoghue and Hurley-Osing 2007

Dickens et al. 2003

Moore, J. H. 2005

Trompeteret al. 2010

Aiken and McColl 2008

Aiken et al. 2008

Item Evaluation Criteria

       

(maximum = 1; minimum = 0)*

       

 1. Independent, blind comparison with a reference standard test

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

 2. Reference standard/true diagnosis selected is a recognized gold standard or reasonable alternative

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 3. Reference standard applied to all patients

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

 4. Actual cases include an appropriate spectrum of severity

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

 5. Non-cases patients are patients who might reasonably present for differential diagnosis

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 6. Non-cases include an appropriate spectrum of patients with alternate diagnoses

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

 7. Justified sample size or not less than 40 participants

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

 8. Test manoeuvre described in sufficient detail to permit replication

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

 9. Exact criteria for interpreting the test results provided

0

0

0

0

0

0

N/A

 10. The reliability of the test procedures documented

0

1

0

0

0

0

N/A

 11. Number of positive and negative results reported for both cases and non-cases

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

 12. Appropriate statistics presented (sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value or likelihood ratios)

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

 13. The qualifications and skills of the examiner described if the test required an element of examiner interpretation

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

 14. Training, skills and experience of the examiner found to be appropriate for test interpretation

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

Total score (%)

71%

71%

71%

64%

57%

42%

33%

Rank

1

1

1

2

3

4

5

  1. *1 indicates that criterion was fulfilled and 0 indicates that criterion was not fulfilled or not reported.
  2. N/A=not applicable to paper. Scores obtained after consensus.