Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Borden Hopkins |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Inaki Imaz |
14 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lan T. Ho-Pham |
15 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patrick Haentjens |
15 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Borden Hopkins |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patrick Haentjens |
29 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lan T. Ho-Pham |
5 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Inaki Imaz |
16 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Borden Hopkins |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
16 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
23 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Borden Hopkins |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
23 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
26 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
26 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-209 |
You can find further information about peer review here.