Skip to main content

Table 2 Analysis of the advance distance for a 90° PIP flexion contracture correction and the distance between distal palmar crease and palmar digital crease (H) in 120 fingers of 30 adults

From: Mathematical analysis in the design of digital artery-based V–Y advancement flap in treating proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture

 

Advance (mm)

P-value

H (mm)

P-value

Male

 Finger

 

 < 0.05*

 

 < 0.05*

  Index (n = 15)

9.9 ± 0.53

 < 0.05 S

23.1 ± 3.34

 < 0.05 S

  Middle (n = 15)

11.7 ± 1.00

 < 0.05 I,S

26.0 ± 5.01

 

  Ring (n = 15)

10.8 ± 0.89

 < 0.05 S

29.4 ± 3.33

 < 0.05 I,S

  Small (n = 15)

8.7 ± 1.43

 < 0.05 I,M,R

23.9 ± 4.30

 < 0.05 R

Female

 Finger

 

 < 0.05*

 

 < 0.05*

  Index (n = 15)

9.5 ± 1.12

 < 0.05 S

21.6 ± 3.27

 < 0.05 R

  Middle (n = 15)

10.7 ± 1.34

 < 0.05 S

22.2 ± 4.68

 < 0.05 R

  Ring (n = 15)

9.8 ± 1.05

 < 0.05 S

26.8 ± 3.21

 < 0.05 I,M,S

  Small (n = 15)

6.5 ± 1.29

 < 0.05 I,M,R

19.9 ± 1.77

 < 0.05 R

  1. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation (range). p values computed by student t test and *One-way ANOVA analysis
  2. S: vs. small fingers
  3. R: vs. ring fingers
  4. M: vs. middle fingers
  5. I: vs. index fingers