Skip to main content

Table 1 Patients’ data

From: Treatment of bipolar clavicle injury with internal plating: a case series and literature review

Patient

Age (years)

Sex

Side

Mechanism

Associated injury

Medial injury

Lateral injury

Time to surgery(days)

Treatment

Follow up(months)

VAS

Shoulder flexion(°)

DASH score

Constant-Murley

Patient Satisfaction

Complication

1

54

F

R

Fall from height

None

Anterior dislocation

Type IV dislocation

4

SC: hook plate

AC: neglected

13

4

150

18.3

72

8

None

2

26

M

L

Crashing

Tooth fracture

Type 1B2 fracture-anterior dislocation

Type IV dislocation

8

SC: hook plate

AC: neglected

14

0

165

3.3

96

10

None

3

58

F

L

Car accident

Chest injury, brain injury

Anterior dislocation

Type II fracture

147

SC: hook plate

AC: plate

37

1

160

10

90

9

None

4

47

F

L

Motorbike accident

None

Anterior dislocation

Type I fracture-Type III dislocation

5

SC: neglected

AC: hook plate

15

0

165

6.7

94

10

None

5

62

F

R

Car accident

Chest injury, ipsilateral scapular fracture

Type 1B2 Fracture

Type II fracture

32

SC: revision with hook plate

AC: hook plate

14

2

150

11.7

88

9

None

6

29

M

R

Fall from height

Chest injury, ipsilateral scapular fracture

Type 1B2 fracture- Anterior dislocation

Type III dislocation

12

SC: hook plate

AC: hook plate

31

0

155

6.7

90

9

None

7

64

M

L

Fall from height

Ipsilateral scapular fracture

Type 1B1 fracture

Type II fracture

10

SC: plate

AC: neglected

73

0

170

5

92

10

None

  1. Medial clavicle fracture was based on the Edinburgh classification. Distal clavicle fracture was based on Neer’s classification. Acromioclavicular joint dislocation was based on Rockwood’s classification. VAS visual analog scale, DASH score Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, AC acromioclavicular joint, SC sternoclavicular joint, F female, M male, L left, R right, IS injured side, CS contralateral side