Skip to main content

Table 5 Post hoc results of comparison between the different treatment protocols (A-B, A-C, A-D, B-C, B-D, and C-D) on left leg circumference as a secondary outcome

From: Comparison of intermittent pneumatic compression device and compression stockings for workers with leg edema and pain after prolonged standing: a prospective crossover clinical trial

Protocol

Foot

p value (95% CI)

Ankle

p value (95% CI)

Calf

p value (95% CI)

Distal thigh

p value (95% CI)

Proximal thigh

p value (95% CI)

A-B

0.23(0.36)

0.001 (0.11 ~ 0.34)

0.11(4.24)

0.089 (-0.03 ~ 0.25)

0.04(0.37)

0.242 (-0.08 ~ 0.16)

0.23(0.42)

0.002 (0.10 ~ 0.37)

0.21(0.41)

0.001 (0.08 ~ 0.34)

A-C

-0.04(0.42)

0.598 (-0.17 ~ 0.10)

-0.12(0.44)

0.043 (-0.26 ~ 0.03)

-0.23(0.41)

0.002 (-0.36 ~ -0.10)

-0.12(0.58)

0.201 (-0.30 ~ 0.07)

-0.19(0.63)

0.082 (-0.40 ~ 0.01)

A-D

0.08(0.39)

0.238 (-0.05 ~ 0.21)

-0.00(0.47)

0.979 (-0.15 ~ 0.15)

-0.09(0.44)

0.276 (-0.24 ~ 0.05)

-0.15(0.68)

0.241 (-0.37 ~ 0.07)

-0.17(0.77)

0.137 (-0.42 ~ 0.08)

B-C

-0.26(0.36)

 < 0.001 (-0.38 ~ -0.15)

-0.23(0.38)

0.001 (-0.35 ~ -0.10)

-0.27(0.45)

0.001 (-0.42 ~ -0.12)

-0.35(0.66)

0.001 (-0.57 ~ -0.14)

-0.40(0.49)

 < 0.001 (-0.56 ~ -0.24)

B-D

-0.15(0.29)

0.006 (-0.24 ~ -0.05)

-0.11(0.52)

0.167 (-0.28 ~ 0.06)

-0.14(0.36)

0.026 (-0.25 ~ -0.02)

-0.38(0.72)

0.002 (-0.61 ~ -0.15)

-0.38(0.64)

0.001 (-0.59 ~ -0.17)

C-D

0.12(0.39)

0.074 (-0.01 ~ 0.24)

0.12(0.40)

0.065 (-0.01 ~ 0.24)

0.13(0.53)

0.043 (-0.04 ~ 0.30)

-0.03(0.75)

0.749 (-0.27 ~ 0.21)

0.02(0.74)

0.833 (-0.22 ~ 0.26)

  1. Data are presented as mean difference (standard) of leg circumference during T1-T2 between the different treatment groups (cm)
  2. Protocol A, no medical compression stocking (MCS) + natural rest; Protocol B, MCS + natural rest; Protocol C, no MCS + intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC); Protocol D, MCS + IPC
  3. Wilcoxon signed rank test on difference (p < 0.008)