Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of 2 groups of patients who underwent TTL or EVO

From: Comparison between single-segment Isobar EVO dynamic stabilization and Isobar TTL dynamic stabilization in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a single center retrospective study over 4 years

 

TTL (n = 39)

EVO (n = 41)

P

Age

46.03 ± 9.46

46.27 ± 8.72

0.78*

Gender (male/female)

19/20

17/24

0.51†

Follow-up time (months)

52.05 ± 2.79

52.39 ± 3.15

0.67*

Operative segment

  

0.88†

 L3/4

3

4

 

 L4/5

23

25

 

 L5/S1

13

12

 

Diseases

  

0.67†

 Spinal stenosis

21

24

 

 Lumbar disc herniation

18

17

 

Complication n, (%)

6, (15.4%)

2, (4.9%)

0.117†

  1. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation
  2. P values are based on the Independent two-sample t-test * or chi-square test†
Back to article page

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us