Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant characteristics (mean ± SD unless indicated otherwise) at baseline for the targeted gluteal and sham interventions

From: Effects of a targeted resistance intervention compared to a sham intervention on gluteal muscle hypertrophy, fatty infiltration and strength in people with hip osteoarthritis: analysis of secondary outcomes from a randomised clinical trial

 

Targeted (N = 13)

Sham (N = 14)

P-value

Age (years)

58.2 ± 10.9

60.1 ± 7.3

0.081

Sex (% female)

46

50

0.842

Height (cm)

173 ± 10

169 ± 10

0.941

Body mass (kg)

88.8 ± 18.2

82.3 ± 15.4

0.291

Body mass index (kg/m2)

29.4 ± 4.4

28.9 ± 5.7

0.671

K-L score (Affected limb)

0.862

 (% grade 2)

54

57

 

 (% grade 3)

46

36

 

 (% grade 4)

0

7

 

K-L score (Contralateral limb)

0.742

 (% grade 0)

8

14

 

 (% grade 1)

31

36

 

 (% grade 2)

46

43

 

 (% grade 3)

15

7

 

 (% grade 4)

0

0

 

OHS (affected limb)

31.5 ± 4.6

33.4 ± 4.9

0.291

  1. Note. Severity of OA was determined according to the Kellgren and Lawrence, 1957 [16] radiological assessment for OA. Kellgren and Lawrence (K-L) score: 0 (none), 1 (doubtful), 2 (minimal), 3 (moderate) and 4 (severe)
  2. 1Independent-samples t-test
  3. 2Chi-square test