Study | TP | FP | FN | TN | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | Positive likelihood ratios (95% CI) | Negative likelihood ratios (95% CI) | Diagnostic Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Auley 1998 [1] | 48 | 171 | 1 | 137 | 0.98 (0.89–1.00) | 0.44 (0.39–0.50) | 1.76 (1.58–1.97) | 0.05 (0.01–0.32) | 38.46 (5.24–282.17) |
Beceren 2013 [3] | 235 | 203 | 83 | 445 | 0.74 (0.69–0.79) | 0.69 (0.65–0.72) | 2.36 (2.07–2.69) | 0.38 (031–0.46) | 6.21 (4.60–8.38) |
Broomhead 2003 [5] | 43 | 187 | 0 | 35 | 1.00 (0.92–1.00) | 0.16 (0.11–0.21) | 1.18 (1.10–1.26) | 0.07 (0.00–1.14) | 16.47 (0.99–273.79) |
Can 2008 [6] | 33 | 173 | 0 | 45 | 1.00 (0.89–1.00) | 0.21 (0.15–0.27) | 1.24 (1.15–1.35) | 0.07 (0.00–1.12) | 17.57 (1.06–292.27) |
Cheng 2016 [7] | 68 | 263 | 3 | 45 | 0.96 (0.88–0.99) | 0.15 (0.11–0.19) | 1.12 (1.05–1.20) | 0.29 (0.09–0.90) | 3.88 (1.17–12.86) |
Daş 2016 [8] | 61 | 190 | 1 | 153 | 0.98 (0.91–1.00) | 0.45 (0.39–0.50) | 1.78 (1.61–1.96) | 0.04 (0.01–0.25) | 49.12 (6.73–358.42) |
Glas 2002 [12] | 44 | 119 | 30 | 69 | 0.59 (0.47–0.71) | 0.37 (0.0–0.44) | 0.94 (0.76–1.17) | 1.10 (0.79–1.54) | 0.85 (0.49–1.48) |
Gomes 2020 [13] | 88 | 278 | 5 | 51 | 0.95 (0.88–0.98) | 0.16 (0.12–0.20) | 1.12 (1.05–1.20) | 0.35 (0.14–0.84) | 3.23 (1.25–8.34) |
Lucchesi 1995 [16] | 9 | 49 | 0 | 21 | 1.00 (0.66–1.00) | 0.30 (0.20–0.42) | 1.36 (1.11–1.68) | 0.17 (0.01–2.52) | 8.25 (0.46–148.27) |
Papacostas 2001 [21] | 7 | 15 | 3 | 42 | 0.70 (0.35–0.93) | 0.74 (0.60–0.84) | 2.66 (1.47–4.82) | 0.41 (0.16–1.06) | 6.53 (1.49–28.57) |
Rosin 1999 [22] | 48 | 190 | 0 | 86 | 1.00 (0.93–1.00) | 0.31 (0.26–0.37) | 1.44 (1.32–1.57) | 0.03 (0.00–0.52) | 44.04 (2.68–722.59) |
Santelli 2008 [24] | 29 | 66 | 0 | 51 | 1.00 (0.88–1.00) | 0.44 (0.34–0.53) | 1.74 (1.48–2.06) | 0.04 (0.00–0.60) | 45.69 (2.73–765.63) |
Salt 1997 [23] | 74 | 244 | 0 | 247 | 1.00 (0.95–1.00) | 0.50 (0.46–0.55) | 2.00 (1.83–2.19) | 0.01 (0.00–0.21) | 150.83 (9.29–2447.58) |
Verma 1997 (prospective) [28] | 152 | 607 | 2 | 150 | 0.99 (0.95–1.00) | 0.20 (0.17–0.23) | 1.23 (1.18–1.28) | 0.07 (0.02–0.26) | 18.78 (4.60–76.65) |
Verma 1997 (retrospective) [28] | 270 | 2181 | 0 | 50 | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.02 (0.02–0.03) | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) | 0.08 (0.01–1.32) | 12.52 (0.77–203.57) |
Wang 2013 [29] | 61 | 65 | 2 | 55 | 0.97 (0.89–1.00) | 0.46 (0.37–0.55) | 1.79 (1.51–2.12) | 0.07 (0.02–0.26) | 25.81 (6.03–110.41) |