From: Evaluating the diagnostic pathway for acute ACL injuries in trauma centres: a systematic review
Authors | Diagnostic accuracy | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ball et al. 2010 [12] | Unspecified | ||||||
Lee and Yun 2019 [17] | Ultrasound performer 1 (%) | Ultrasound performer 2 (%) | |||||
Sensitivity | 90.6 | 96.9 | |||||
Specificity | 93.3 | 90 | |||||
Positive predictive value (PPV) | 93.6 | 91.2 | |||||
Negative Predictive value (NPV) | 90.3 | 96.4 | |||||
Accuracy | 91.9 | 93.6 | |||||
Hardy et al. 2017 [3] | Sensitivity | All 4 facets | 57.8% | ||||
3 facets | 83.9% | ||||||
2 facets | 95.8% | ||||||
1 facet | 99.5% | ||||||
Wang et al. 2016 [7] | Group 1- Aspirated knee (Sensitivity) | Group 2- non-Aspirated knee (Sensitivity) | |||||
ED | Lachman’s | 47.1% | ED | Lachman’s | 40.5% | ||
Pivot shift | 11.8% | Pivot shift | 9.5% | ||||
OPD | Lachman’s | 76.5% | OPD | Lachman’s | 47.5% | ||
Pivot shift | 76.5% | Pivot shift | 31.0% | ||||
Parwaiz et al. 2016 [6] | Unspecified | ||||||
Clifford et al. 2021 [9] | Sensitivity | ||||||
Lachman’s | 74.5%a | ||||||
Anterior Drawer | 61.4%a | ||||||
Pivot Shift | 100%a |