Skip to main content

Table 4 Within group change score and pairwise comparison of between group differences for cervical range of motion

From: Effect of post-isometric relaxation versus myofascial release therapy on pain, functional disability, rom and qol in the management of non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Outcome

measures

Baselinea

2 weeksa

Mean within group differencesb

Baseline to 2 weeks

Mean between group differencesb

Baseline to 2 weeks

Flexion (0)

PIR group

33.8 ± 5.7

44.6 ± 1.3

-10.8(p < 0.001)

 
    

-0.6(p = 0.842)

MRF group

33.1 ± 5.7

44.6 ± 1.2

-11.5(p < 0.001)

 

Extension (0)

PIR group

34.8 ± 5.1

43.4 ± 1.6

-8.6(p < 0.001)

 
    

1.4(p = 0.010)

MRF group

32.6 ± 6.7

42.0 ± 2.7

-9.4(p < 0.001)

 

Right Side Bending (0)

PIR group

28.8 ± 6.9

43.7 ± 2.1

-14.9(p < 0.001)

 
    

0.9(p = 0.937)

MRF group

26.8 ± 7.3

42.7 ± 2.4

-15.9(p < 0.001)

 

Left Side Bending (0)

PIR group

29.2 ± 6.7

43.1 ± 2.4

-14.5(p < 0.001)

 
    

-1.1(p = 0.982)

MRF group

28.5 ± 8.1

44.3 ± 1.7

-15.8(p < 0.001)

 

Right Rotation (0)

PIR group

63.0 ± 9.3

79.1 ± 2.2

-16.1(p < 0.001)

 
    

1.4(p = 0.062)

MRF group

63.4 ± 9.3

77.6 ± 4.6

-14.2(p < 0.001)

 

Left Rotation (0)

PIR group

66.5 ± 8.8

79.2 ± 2.2

-12.7(p < 0.001)

 
    

2.7(p = 0.012)

MRF group

64.9 ± 8.7

76.5 ± 5.9

-11.6(p < 0.001)

 
  1. PIR Post isometric relaxation, MFR Myofascial release, CROM Cervical range of motion
  2. (.0)Ranges in degree
  3. aValues of mean and standard deviation
  4. bValues of mean difference and p-value