Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient demographics. SD, standard deviation; OA, osteoarthritis; PS, posterior stabilized; CR, cruciate retaining

From: Comparative retrieval analysis of a novel anatomic tibial tray backside: alterations in tibial component design and surface coating can increase cement adhesions and surface roughness

Case number

Gender

Age, yrs

Time to revision, yrs

Reason(s) for revision

Design, Type

Revision surgeon

1

F

51.3

0.4

Patellofemoral, stiffness, malalignment

NexGen®, PS

Surgeon 1

2

M

50.9

3.0

Instability

Persona®, PS

Surgeon 1

3

F

71.1

1.0

Instability, patellofemoral

Persona®, CR

Surgeon 1

4

F

76.6

9.0

Instability

NexGen®, PS

Surgeon 2

5

F

61.8

5.9

Periprosthetic fracture

NexGen®, CR

Surgeon 2

6

F

71.3

5.9

Instability

NexGen®, CR

Surgeon 2

7

F

67.3

7.8

Malalignment

NexGen®, CR

Surgeon 2

8

M

70.6

1.6

Instability

Persona®, PS

Surgeon 1

9

F

67.8

3.5

Instability, stiffness

Persona®, CR

Surgeon 1

10

F

69.2

1.4

Instability, patellofemoral

Persona®, PS

Surgeon 1

11

F

66.3

14.8

Progression of OA

NexGen®, PS

Surgeon 2

12

F

72.2

1.5

Instability, patellofemoral

Persona®, PS

Surgeon 1

13

F

52.4

0.9

Stiffness

NexGen®, CR

Surgeon 2

14

F

69.3

1.9

Instability

NexGen®, PS

Surgeon 2

15

F

79.6

9.7

Instability

NexGen®, CR

Surgeon 2

16

M

69.3

5.8

Instability

NexGen®, CR

Surgeon 2

17

F

84.2

10.1

Instability

NexGen®, CR

Surgeon 2

18

F

79.8

14.1

Instability

NexGen®, CR

Surgeon 2

19

F

72.8

13.1

Instability

NexGen®, CR

Surgeon 2

20

F

80.2

1.2

Stiffness

NexGen®, CR

Surgeon 2

21

M

70.5

3.2

Instability, malalignment

Persona®, CR

Surgeon 1

22

F

58.3

18.1

Instability

NexGen®, PS

Surgeon 2

23

F

66.0

2.2

Instability

Persona®, CR

Surgeon 1