Urdu translation and cross-cultural validation of Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)

Table 6 Reliability analysis on 120 patients in week 1 and week 2

Urdu-CAIT	First Measurement Mean ± SD	2nd Measurement Mean ± SD	SEM	SDC	ICC_2,1 (95% CI)	Item-total correlation U-CAIT	Cronbach’s Alpha
Question 1	2.8 ± 1.37	2.7 ± 1.34	0.087	0.81	0.95 (0.93–0.96)	0.90	0.949
Question 2	1.6 ± 1.23	1.5 ± 1.18	0.077	0.76	0.98 (0.96–0.98)	0.95	0.976
Question 3	1.2 ± 0.75	1.2 ± 0.64	0.042	0.56	0.93 (0.90–0.95)	0.87	0.929
Question 4	1.5 ± 0.75	1.5 ± 0.54	0.048	0.60	0.95 (0.93–0.96)	0.90	0.950
Question 5	1.3 ± 0.54	1.2 ± 0.51	0.034	0.51	0.90 (0.86- 0.93)	0.82	0.905
Question 6	1.0 ± 1.04	0.9 ± 0.98	0.065	0.67	0.94 (0.92–0.96)	0.89	0.944
Question 7	1.9 ± 1.04	1.8 ± 0.98	0.065	0.67	0.98 (0.96–0.98)	0.95	0.976
Question 8	2.1. ± 0.84	2.0 ± 0.83	0.056	0.61	0.92 (0.88–0.94)	0.84	0.918
Question 9	1.9 ± 0.86	2.0 ± 0.83	0.054	0.61	0.93 (0.90–0.95)	0.87	0.930
Total Score	15.5 ± 5.11	14.9 ± 5.16	0.331	1.59	0.94 (0.92–0.96)	0.89	0.948

Abbreviations; CAIT Cumberland ankle instability tool, W1 Week 1, W2 Week 2, SD Standard deviation, SEM Standard Error Mean, SDC Smallest Detectable Change, ICC Intraclass correlation]

ISSN: 1471-2474