Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics and demographic data

From: Joint aspiration and serum markers - do they matter in the diagnosis of native shoulder sepsis? A systematic review

Study

Year

Study Design

LOE

Mean MINORS

Score

Mean FU, mo

Patients/Shoulders, n

Mean

Age, yr

Male/Female, n

Armbuster et al. [22]

1977

Case series

IV

6

NR

5/5

63.4

5/0

Master et al. [12]

1977

Case series

IV

5

NR

7/8

63

7/0

Gelberman et al. [1]

1980

Case series

IV

7

> 6

15/16

58

NR

Leslie et al. [6]

1989

Case series

IV

8

31.2

18/18

63

14/4

Pfeiffenberg et al. [23]

1996

Case series

IV

9

NR

14/14

57

NR

Lossos et al. [5]

1998

Case series

IV

9

NR

6/6

76

4/2

Wick et al. [24]

2003

Case series

IV

9

NR

11/11

52.1

NR

Chanet et al. [25]

2005

Case series

IV

8

NR

6/6

67.6

0/6

Smith et al. [9]

2005

Case series

IV

7

54

17/20

64

11/6

Jeon et al. [2]

2006

Case series

IV

9

16.4

19/19

59 (23–89)

17/2

Duncan et al. [8]

2008

Case series

IV

10

6

19/19

75.5 (49–94)

NR

Rhee et al. [26]

2008

Case series

IV

9

30

13/13

56

10/3

Kirchhoff et al. [10]

2008

Case series

IV

12

NR

25/25

66.5

15/10

Klinger et al. [3]

2010

Case series

IV

11

35.4

21/23

64.7

10/11

Matsuhashi et al. [27]

2011

Case series

IV

9

103.3

10/10

61.7

4/6

Abdel et al. [28]

2013

Case series

IV

10

31

46/50

66

35/11

Garofalo et al. [29]

2014

Case series

IV

8

NR

10/10

67.9

8/2

Cho et al. [30]

2016

Case series

IV

12

32.4

32/34

61.8

15/17

Jung et al. [31]

2016

Case series

IV

12

14

68/68

66.4

39/29

Sobreira et al. [32]

2016

Case series

IV

7

12.2

7/8

74

4/3

Böhler et al. [33]

2017

Retrospective cohort

III

20

NR

59/59

72

25/34

Jiang et al. [17]

2017

Retrospective cohort

III

16

NR

Group 1: 1223/1223

Group 2: 4355/4355

Group 3: 799/799

Group1; 62.8

Group 2: 60.6

Group3: 62

Group 1:682/541

Group 2: 2661/1694

Group 3: 490/309

Kim et al. [34]

2018

Retrospective cohort

III

21

Group s: 32.9

Group r: 30.8

Group s: 29/29

Group r:13/13

Group s: 61

Group r: 67.5

Group s:14/15

Group r:7/6

Sweet et al. [35]

2018

Case series

IV

11

83.1

97/97

58.2

58/39

Gramlich et al. [16]

2019

Case series

IV

10

NR

29/29

73 (38–93)

19/10

Lee et al. [13]

2019

Retrospective cohort

III

18

Group 1: 28.8

Group 2: 28.8

Group 1: 27/27

Group 2: 30/30

Group 1: 54.9

Group 2: 56.3

Group 1: 12/15

Group 2: 19/11

Joo et al. [18]

2020

Retrospective case-control

III

20

NR

97/97

61

53/44

Khazi et al. [19]

2020

Retrospective cohort

III

16

1

204/204

NR

133/71

Kwon et al. [36]

2020

Case series

IV

10

14.3

35/36

63.8

15/20

Rhee et al. [14]

2020

Case series

IV

14

27.6

31/31

54.9

11/20

Takahasi et al. [37]

2020

Case series

IV

11

NR

22/22

67.9

10/12

  1. Abbreviations: LOE Level of Evidence, FU Follow-up, NR Not reported
  2. Note for studies consisting of more than one group, average age shows each group’s average