From: Impact of heterotopic ossification following lumbar total disk replacement: a systematic review
Ref | HO at the surgical level | Patients with indications of HO at index level | Percentage of patients with HO | HO graded by McAfee or other scale? | Mean percentage change in visual analogue scores for perceived patient pain | Mean percentage change in Oswestry disability scores of patients | Mean percentage change in range of motion at the index level of the artificial disc(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[52] | N/A | 41 | 91.1 | YES | 61.1 | 60.1 | N/A |
[47] | 11 | 11 | 5.88 | NO | 73.6 | 66.4 | 31.8 |
[67] | 30 | N/A | 50 | YES | N/A | N/A | N/A |
[68] | 26 | N/A | 74.3 | YES | 81.6 | 89.9 | N/A |
[53] | 37 | 37 | 23.7 | YES | 82.6 | 68.9 | 10.6 |
[54] | 3 | 3 | 5.36 | NO | 68.5 | 64.7 | N/A |
[56] | 25 | N/A | 71.4 | YES | 82.8 | 68.1 | -37 |
[55] | N/A | 1 | 3.33 | NO | 82.6 | 62.8 | 27.99 |
[57] | 0 | 0 | 0 | YES | N/A | 81.5 | N/A |
[58] | 12 | N/A | 85.7 | NO | N/A | N/A | N/A |
[59] | N/A | 7 | 20 | NO | 74.4 | 69.3 | N/A |
[69] | 19 | N/A | 83 | YES | N/A | N/A | N/A |
[60] | 25 | N/A | 30.5 | YES | N/A | N/A | N/A |
[61] | N/A | 7 | 15.2 | NO | N/A | N/A | N/A |
[70] | N/A | 39 | 73.6 | YES | N/A | N/A | N/A |
[48] | N/A | 32,36 | 15.9,19.3 | NO | 69.6, 71.8 | 63.7, 66.1 | 15.3 |
[62] | N/A | 3 | 3 | NO | N/A | N/A | N/A |
[49] | 17 | 17 | 18.9 | NO | 55.7 | 49.4 | N/A |
[50] | 3,1 | 3,1 | 1.6, 1.1 | NO | 74,68 | 67, 61 | N/A |
[63] | 0 | 0 | 0 | yes | 50 | 50 | N/A |
[64] | 3 | 3 | 4.69 | YES | 57.9 | 47.3 | N/A |
[71] | N/A | 4 | 14.2 | NO | N/A | N/A | N/A |
[66] | 0 | 0 | 0 | YES | 64.9 | 69.3 | N/A |
[72] | 7 | 7 | 6.6 | NO | N/A | N/A | N/A |
[51] | 1 | 1 | 2.22 | YES | N/A | N/A | N/A |
[65] | N/A | 1 | 3.56 | NO | N/A | 30.2 | N/A |