Skip to main content

Table 2 Study characteristics

From: Impact of heterotopic ossification following lumbar total disk replacement: a systematic review

Ref

First Author

Study Location

Year of Publication

Journal

Study Design

Sample Size

Outcome Measure(s)

Mean Follow Up (years)

[52]

G.Pokorny

Brasil

2019

World Neurosurgery

Non random, prospective

60

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, reoperation rates

7.75

[47]

F. Gornet

USA

2019

Journal of Neurological spine

RCT

577

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, ROM, Reoperation rates

5

[67]

H.Park

Korea

2018

The Spine Journal

Retrospective case review

65

Heterotopic ossification rates

8.7

[68]

S.Lu

China

2018

The Spine Journal

Retrospective

35

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores

15.2

[53]

V,A. Byvaltsev

Russia

2017

Coluna/Columna

Non random, prospective

156

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, ROM

3

[54]

A,G. Tohmeh

USA

2015

European Spine Journal

Non random, prospective

64

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, Reoperation rates

3

[56]

S. Lu

China

2015

European Spine Journal

Non random, prospective

35

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, ROM, Reoperation rates

11.8

[55]

S.Lu

China

2015

Journal of Spinal Disorders

Non random, prospective

32

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, ROM, Reoperation rates

2.4

[57]

J,R. Baldeston

USA

2014

Spine

Non random, prospective

15

Heterotopic ossification, ODI scores

9.6

[58]

A,R. Meir

Australia

2013

The Spine Journal

Non random, prospective

28

Heterotopic ossification, Reoperation rates

9.6

[59]

L. Marchi

Brazil

2012

International Journal of Spine Surgery

Non random, prospective

36

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, Reoperation rates

3

[69]

C. Jones

Australia

2012

Orthopaedic Surgery

Retrospective

25

Heterotopic ossification

2.83

[60]

S. Park

Korea

2011

International Orthopaedics

Non random, Prospective

65

Heterotopic ossification

3.75

[61]

G. Cinotti

Italy

1996

Spine

Non random, Prospective

46

Heterotopic ossification, Reoperation rates

3.2

[70]

M. Putzier

Germany

2006

European Spine Journal

Retrospective

71

Heterotopic ossification, Reoperation rates

17.3

[48]

R. Guyer

USA

2016

Spine

RCT

394

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, ROM, Reoperation rates

5

[62]

J, P. Lemaire

France

2005

Journal of Spinal Disorders

Non random, prospective

107

Heterotopic ossification

11.3

[49]

R. Guyer

USA

2009

The Spine Journal

RCT

133

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores

5

[50]

R. Garcia Jr

USA

2015

Spine

RCT

324

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, Reoperation rates

2

[63]

M. Katsimihas

Canada

2010

Canadian Journal of Surgery

Non random, prospective

64

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, Reoperation rates

4.58

[64]

J,C. Le Huec

France

2005

Orthopaedic Clinics of North America

Non random, prospective

64

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores

2

[71]

A,V. Ooij

Netherlands

2003

Journal of Spinal Disorders

Retrospective

27

Heterotopic ossification

7.58

[66]

E. Van De Kelft

Belgium

2012

World Neurosurgery

Non random, prospective

50

Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores

4

[72]

T. David

France

2007

Spine

Retrospective

108

Heterotopic ossification, Reoperation rates

13.2

[51]

P. McAfee

USA

2003

Journal of Spinal Disorders and techniques

RCT

60

Heterotopic ossification

3

[65]

R. Fraser

Australia

2004

The Spine Journal

Non random, prospective

28

Heterotopic ossification rates, ODI scores, Reoperation rates

2