From: Impact of heterotopic ossification following lumbar total disk replacement: a systematic review
Ref | First Author | Study Location | Year of Publication | Journal | Study Design | Sample Size | Outcome Measure(s) | Mean Follow Up (years) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[52] | G.Pokorny | Brasil | 2019 | World Neurosurgery | Non random, prospective | 60 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, reoperation rates | 7.75 |
[47] | F. Gornet | USA | 2019 | Journal of Neurological spine | RCT | 577 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, ROM, Reoperation rates | 5 |
[67] | H.Park | Korea | 2018 | The Spine Journal | Retrospective case review | 65 | Heterotopic ossification rates | 8.7 |
[68] | S.Lu | China | 2018 | The Spine Journal | Retrospective | 35 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores | 15.2 |
[53] | V,A. Byvaltsev | Russia | 2017 | Coluna/Columna | Non random, prospective | 156 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, ROM | 3 |
[54] | A,G. Tohmeh | USA | 2015 | European Spine Journal | Non random, prospective | 64 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, Reoperation rates | 3 |
[56] | S. Lu | China | 2015 | European Spine Journal | Non random, prospective | 35 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, ROM, Reoperation rates | 11.8 |
[55] | S.Lu | China | 2015 | Journal of Spinal Disorders | Non random, prospective | 32 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, ROM, Reoperation rates | 2.4 |
[57] | J,R. Baldeston | USA | 2014 | Spine | Non random, prospective | 15 | Heterotopic ossification, ODI scores | 9.6 |
[58] | A,R. Meir | Australia | 2013 | The Spine Journal | Non random, prospective | 28 | Heterotopic ossification, Reoperation rates | 9.6 |
[59] | L. Marchi | Brazil | 2012 | International Journal of Spine Surgery | Non random, prospective | 36 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, Reoperation rates | 3 |
[69] | C. Jones | Australia | 2012 | Orthopaedic Surgery | Retrospective | 25 | Heterotopic ossification | 2.83 |
[60] | S. Park | Korea | 2011 | International Orthopaedics | Non random, Prospective | 65 | Heterotopic ossification | 3.75 |
[61] | G. Cinotti | Italy | 1996 | Spine | Non random, Prospective | 46 | Heterotopic ossification, Reoperation rates | 3.2 |
[70] | M. Putzier | Germany | 2006 | European Spine Journal | Retrospective | 71 | Heterotopic ossification, Reoperation rates | 17.3 |
[48] | R. Guyer | USA | 2016 | Spine | RCT | 394 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, ROM, Reoperation rates | 5 |
[62] | J, P. Lemaire | France | 2005 | Journal of Spinal Disorders | Non random, prospective | 107 | Heterotopic ossification | 11.3 |
[49] | R. Guyer | USA | 2009 | The Spine Journal | RCT | 133 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores | 5 |
[50] | R. Garcia Jr | USA | 2015 | Spine | RCT | 324 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, Reoperation rates | 2 |
[63] | M. Katsimihas | Canada | 2010 | Canadian Journal of Surgery | Non random, prospective | 64 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores, Reoperation rates | 4.58 |
[64] | J,C. Le Huec | France | 2005 | Orthopaedic Clinics of North America | Non random, prospective | 64 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores | 2 |
[71] | A,V. Ooij | Netherlands | 2003 | Journal of Spinal Disorders | Retrospective | 27 | Heterotopic ossification | 7.58 |
[66] | E. Van De Kelft | Belgium | 2012 | World Neurosurgery | Non random, prospective | 50 | Heterotopic ossification rates, Pain VAS scores, ODI scores | 4 |
[72] | T. David | France | 2007 | Spine | Retrospective | 108 | Heterotopic ossification, Reoperation rates | 13.2 |
[51] | P. McAfee | USA | 2003 | Journal of Spinal Disorders and techniques | RCT | 60 | Heterotopic ossification | 3 |
[65] | R. Fraser | Australia | 2004 | The Spine Journal | Non random, prospective | 28 | Heterotopic ossification rates, ODI scores, Reoperation rates | 2 |