Skip to main content

Table 1 Mean ± SD values and statistical significance for IF (%), C.Perf (J) and BR (J) for arm position (45° vs. 90°), arm dominance (Dom vs. Non-Dom) and muscle group (ER vs. IR) without consideration of sexes

From: Sex differences in shoulder performance fatiguability are affected by arm position, dominance and muscle group

 

Arm position

Arm dominance

Muscle Group

45°

90°

P-value

Dominant

Non-dominant

P-value

IR

ER

P-value

IF (%)

-42.60 ± 11.34

-42.81 ± 11.42

P = 0.870

-41.91 ± 10.51

-43.58 ± 12.18

P = 0.200

-40.91 ± 11.60

-44.56 ± 10.94

P = 0.046

C.Perf (J)

750.44 ± 441.51

809.39 ± 411.76

P = 0.390

982.36 ± 448.19

933.58 ± 448.19

P = 0.350

1136.06 ± 477.59

782.47 ± 320.81

P < 0.0005

BR (J)

34.26 ± 19.38

37.89 ± 18.77

P = 0.320

44.16 ± 18.96

42.33 ± 19.45

P = 0.400

50.43 ± 20.28

36.22 ± 14.91

P < 0.0005