Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation

Table 3 Outcomes of univariate binary logistic regression analysis for risk factors

Factors	CS group	NCS group	Rough OR (95% CI)	P
Sex (male: female)	34:45	65:98	1.082:1(0.626–1.867)	0.778
Age (years)	67.1 ± 10.4	64.5 ± 9.1	1.437:1(0.833–2.479)	0.192
BMI (Kg/m²)	25.0 ± 3.1	24.7 ± 3.4	1.213:1(0.692–2.128)	0.500
Diagnosed with DS (Yes: No)	33:46	55:108	1.409:1(0.811–2.448)	0.224
BMD (≤ -2.5: > -2.5)	24:51	22:142	3.935:1(2.020–7.668)	< 0.001*
DH distraction (mm)	3.3 ± 1.4	2.9 ± 1.3	1.267 (1.039–1.544)	0.019*
Disk space morphology
(Flat: Concave)	42:29	59:83	2.037:1(1.142–3.635)	0.016*
(Irregular: Concave)	8:29	21:83	1.090:1(0.436–2.729)	0.835
Endplate injury (Yes: No)	18:61	11:152	4.077:1(1.820–9.136)	0.001*
Endplate sclerosis (Yes: No)	2:77	15:148	3.902:1(0.870–17.503)	0.075*
Cage position	22.8 ± 7.4%	22.4 ± 7.0%	2.735(0.060–124.657)	0.606

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation. DS Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
^*: P < 0.15, statistical significance for univariate binary logistic regression analysis

ISSN: 1471-2474