Radiographic results on acetabular cup placement with the SuperPath technique: a retrospective study of 756 cases

Table 6 Comparison of SuperPath with conventional surgical approaches reported in the recent literature

	Surgical approaches	Number of patients	IA (mean ± SD) (°)	AA (mean ± SD) (°)
Xie et al. [23]	SuperPath	46	43,6 ± 6,8	17,4 ± 1,6
Xie et al. [23]	Conventional posterior	46	44,5 ± 6,5	18,5 ± 1,8
Ouyang et al. [48]	SuperPath	12	37,08 ± 6,53	21,92 ± 5,78
Ouyang et al. [48]	Posterolateral	12	39, 67 ± 6,95	21,75 ± 4,48
Meng et al. [59]	SuperPath	4	38, 75 ± 8,21	15 ± 1,82
Meng et al. [59]	Posterolateral	4	44,5 ± 3,64	14,25 ± 2,06
Meng et al. [46]	SuperPath	20	36,94 ± 6,37	13,94 ± 4,73
Meng et al. [46]	Posterolateral	20	42,66 ± 3,58	15,11 ± 4,06
Tottas et al. [60]	SuperPath	25	51,2 ± 4,8	20,5 ± 9,8
Tottas et al. [60]	Hardinge	23	43,77 ± 4,4	25 ± 7,9

ISSN: 1471-2474