Skip to main content

Table 3 Descriptive results

From: Preoperative predictors of health-related quality of life changes (EQ-5D and EQ VAS) after total hip and knee replacement: a systematic review

Author

Country

Joint (total)

Study design/data

Method

Time to follow-up

Number of patients

Baker et al. (2012) [34]

UK

Knee

National Joint Registry Data

Adjusted and unadjusted multiple regressions

6 to 12 months

13.673

Foster et al. (2015) [35]

USA

Hip

Institution-wide registry

F-tests

Not given

435

Galea et al. (2019) [36]

USA

Hip

Prospective, international, multi-center study

piece-wise linear mixed effects models

3 months, 1,3,5,7 years

976

Giesinger et al. (2021) [37]

Switzerland

Knee

Institution-wide study

Linear mixed models

12 months

1.565

Gordon et al. (2014) [38]

Sweden

Hip

Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Robust covariance matrix

12 months

27.245

Greene et al. (2014) [39]

Sweden

Hip

Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Linear regression models

12 months

11.464

Jenkins et al. (2013) [40]

UK

Hip/Knee

Regional registry

Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance

12 months

671

Joly et al. (2020) [41]

Canada

Hip/Knee

Retrospective study

descriptive analysis, one-way analysis of variance test, Chi-squared test, multivariate linear regression

3 and 12 months

53.498

Koekenbier et al. (2016) [42]

Finland, Greece, Iceland, Spain, Sweden

Hip/Knee

Prospective cohort study

General linear model

6 months

762

Manalo et al. (2018) [43]

USA

Knee

Institution-wide registry

Paired t-tests

12–17 months

167

McLawhorn et al. (2017) [44]

USA

Hip

Institution-wide registry

Pearson’s chi-square test, regression analysis

2 years

2.733

Mohaddes et al. (2019) [45]

Sweden

Hip

Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Non-parametric tests

12 months

1.008

Ostendorf et al. (2004) [46]

USA

Knee

Institution-wide registry

Pair-wise comparisons using the Holm step-down Bonferroni method

2 years

147

Peters et al. (2020) [47]

Netherlands

Hip

Retrospective observational study, Dutch Arthroplasty Register

Multivariable linear regression analysis

3 and 12 months

22.357

Rehman et al. (2020) [48]

Norway

Knee

Longitudinal study

Paired sample t-tests, kappa statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, multivariable regression analysis

12 months

245

Rolfson et al. (2011) [49]

Sweden

Hip

Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Mann-Whitney U-test, multivariable regression

12 months

34.960

Scott et al. (2021) [50]

Scotland

Knee

Institution-wide study

Parametric and non-parametric tests, multivariable linear regressions

12 months

259

Steinhaus et al. (2020) [51]

UK

Knee

Institution-wide registry

Pair-wise comparisons using the Holm step-down Bonferroni method.

2 years

2.472

Tilbury et al. (2016) [52]

Netherlands

Hip Knee

Prospective cohort study

Mann-Whitney-U-test and multivariable linear regressions

12 months

573

Torisho et al. (2019) [53]

Sweden

Hip

Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Multiple linear regression

12 months

30.756

Williams et al. (2013) [54]

UK

Knee (total/unicompartmental)

Prospective cohort study

Linear regression models

6 months

2.126