Skip to main content

Table 2 Patients’ characteristics and outcomes in the nerve-sparing surgery and non-surgical treatment groups

From: Intralesional nerve-sparing surgery versus non-surgical treatment for giant cell tumor of the sacrum

 

Nerve-sparing surgery group (n = 9)

Non-surgical treatment group (n = 6)

Age (years)

Mean 29 (range, 15–48)

Mean 40 (range, 14–66)

Sex

  

  Male

2 (22%)

2 (33%)

  Female

7 (78%)

4 (67%)

Tumor volume (cm3)

Mean 111 (range, 14–235)

Mean 272 (range, 99–678)

Tumor level

  

  Above S3

3 (33%)

1 (17%)

  At or below S3

1 (11%)

0

At both levels

5 (56%)

5 (83%)

Involvement of the sacro-iliac joint

  

  No

4 (44%)

6 (100%)

  Yes

5 (56%)

0

Involvement of the vascular or other organ system

  

  No

4 (44%)

5 (83%)

  Yes

5 (56%)

1 (17%)

Location

  

  Central

2 (22%)

5 (83%)

  Eccentric

7 (78%)

1 (17%)

Local recurrence or tumor progression

  

  No

5 (56%)

6 (100%)

  Yes

4 (44%)

0

Lung metastasis

  

  No

8 (89%)

6 (100%)

  Yes

1 (11%)

0

Oncological outcome

  

  CDF

5 (56%)

0

  NED

1 (11%)

0

  AWD

3 (33%)

6 (100%)

Complications

  

  None

5 (56%)

5 (83%)

  Infection

1 (11%)

0

  Bladder laceration

1 (11%)

0

  Stress fracture of the sacro-iliac joint

1 (11%)

0

  Apical granuloma of the tooth

1 (11%)

0

  Osteonecrosis of the jaw

0

1 (17%)

Karnofsky performance status

Mean 87 (range, 65–95)

Mean 88 (range, 75–100)

Total of modified Biagini score

Mean 0.9 (range, 0–4)

Mean 0.5 (range, 0–2)

Follow-up (months)

Mean 85 (range, 25–154)

Mean 59 (range, 17–94)

  1. CDF, continuous disease free; NED, no evidence of disease; AWD, alive with disease