Skip to main content

Table 3 Methodological Characteristics of Included Systematic Reviews

From: The usage of drainage after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty: best evidence selection and risk of bias considerations

Authors

Primary Study design

Level of evidence

Software

Sensitivity analysis

Subgroup analysis

GRADE evidence profiles

Parker et al. 2001

Prospective trials

II/III

NM

No

Yes

No

Parker et al. 2004

RCT and qRCT

II

NM

No

Yes

No

Parker et al. 2007

Prospective trials

II/III

NM

No

Yes

No

Zhang et al. 2011

RCT and qRCT

II

Revman

Yes

No

No

Zhou et al. 2013

RCT

II

Revman and Stata

Yes

No

No

Chen et al. 2014

RCT and qRCT

II

Revman

Yes

No

Yes

Kelly et al. 2014

RCT and qRCT

II

Revman

No

No

No

Li et al. 2015

RCT

II

Revman

No

No

No

Quinn et al. 2015

RCT

II

Revman

No

No

No

Si et al. 2016

RCT

II

Revman

No

Yes

No

Zan et al. 2016

RCT

II

Revman

Yes

Yes

No

Zhang et al. 2018

RCT

II

Stata

No

Yes

No

  1. NM not mentioned, RCT randomized controlled trials, qRCT quasi-randomized controlled trials