Paradoxical spinopelvic motion: does global balance influence spinopelvic motion in total hip arthroplasty?

Table 3 Liner regression analysis of ∆SVA and sagittal parameters

	Univariate			Multivariable
	Unstandardized β coefficients	Standardized β coefficients	p value	Unstandardized β coefficients	Standardized β coefficients	p value
Constant				−11.97		< 0.001**
∆TK	−0.23	−0.36	< 0.001**	0.05	0.08	0.287
∆SS	−0.02	−0.06	0.495
Standing PI	0.00	−0.01	0.925
∆LL	−0.15	−0.53	< 0.001**	−0.23	−0.82	< 0.001**
∆PT	0.03	0.07	0.466
∆PFA	−0.08	−0.27	0.003**	−0.17	−0.60	< 0.001**

(Multivariable regression model: ΔSVA = − 11.97 + 0.05ΔTK-0.23ΔLL – 0.17ΔPFA, Adjusted R² = 0.558)
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
SVA C7-sagittal vertical axis, TK thoracic kyphosis, LL lumbar lordosis, SS sacral slope, PT pelvic tilt, PFA proximal femur angle, PI pelvic incidence

ISSN: 1471-2474