Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic data of age, sex, operation level-matched cohort

From: Clinical and radiological outcomes in patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparisons between unilateral and bilateral cage insertion

 

Category

Group U

(N = 19)

Group B

(N = 57)

P value

Age (yr)

 

65.6 ± 10.7

65.3 ± 9.0

0.905

Sex

M

10 (52.6%)

30 (52.6%)

1.000

F

9 (47.4%)

27 (47.4%)

 

Height (cm)

 

160.0 ± 8.7

156.4 ± 8.8

0.125

Weight (kg)

 

66.4 ± 9.9

61.4 ± 9.5

0.053

BMI (kg/m2)

 

25.9 ± 2.4

25.0 ± 2.7

0.229

BMD (T score)

 

−0.6 ± 1.6

− 0.9 ± 1.3

0.515

Smoking

Y

5 (26.3%)

6 (10.5%)

0.090

N

14 (73.7%)

51 (89.5%)

 

Number of Op. level

1

9 (47.4%)

27 (47.4%)

1.000

2

10 (52.6%)

30 (52.6%)

 

Op. level

L3–4

1 (5.3%)

3 (5.3%)

0.014

L3–4-5

5 (26.3%)

20 (35.1%)

 

L4–5

2 (10.5%)

21 (36.8%)

 

L4–5-S1

5 (26.3%)

10 (17.5%)

 

L5-S1

6 (31.6%)

3 (5.3%)

 

Previous laminectomy

Yes

5 (26.3%)

1 (1.8%)

0.003

Asymmetric disc collapsea

Yes

6 (31.5%)

5 (8.8%)

0.014

  1. Mean and standard variation in continuous variables and number of cases in categorical variables
  2. Group U: Unilateral cage insertion; Group B: Bilateral cage insertion
  3. M Male, F Female, BMI Body mass index, BMD Bone mineral density
  4. a Five or more degree of asymmetric disc wedging on the radiographs