Skip to main content

Table 10 Changes in range of motion of adjacent segments of the final follow-up

From: Pretic-I was a safe and effective artificial cervical disc prosthesis--a retrospective and comparative study with 5-year follow-up

Items

Groups

Pre-operative

Final Follow-up

P Value

Statistical Power

FSU ROM of Upper Adjacent Segment

 Flexion ROM (°)

Discover (n = 32)

6.20 ± 4.24

7.26 ± 4.06

0.2693

(−)

Pretic-I (n = 32)

6.79 ± 3.87

7.54 ± 4.38

0.4141

(−)

 Extension ROM (°)

Discover (n = 32)

6.24 ± 4.71

4.81 ± 3.63

0.0614

(−)

Pretic-I (n = 32)

4.99 ± 3.05

4.92 ± 3.12

0.9225

(−)

 Total ROM (°)

Discover (n = 32)

12.43 ± 6.10

12.07 ± 5.29

0.7524

(−)

Pretic-I (n = 32)

11.78 ± 4.92

12.46 ± 3.12

0.4892

(−)

FSU ROM of Lower Adjacent Segment

 Flexion ROM (°)

Discover (n = 32)

7.68 ± 3.41

7.02 ± 3.64

0.3737

(−)

Pretic-I (n = 32)

8.14 ± 5.82

6.15 ± 2.42

0.0449*

75.50%

 Extension ROM (°)

Discover (n = 32)

4.19 ± 3.59

3.75 ± 2.76

0.4143

(−)

Pretic-I (n = 32)

3.46 ± 2.41

4.21 ± 2.61

0.1973

(−)

 Total ROM (°)

Discover (n = 32)

11.87 ± 4.92

10.77 ± 4.22

0.1007

(−)

Pretic-I (n = 32)

11.59 ± 6.06

10.37 ± 3.75

0.1705

(−)

  1. ROM Range of motion, FSU Functional segment unit, (−) Without valid data
  2. * indicates that the data has a P value less than 0.05