Skip to main content

Table 3 Patient satisfaction and clinical outcome

From: Different outcomes after proximal femoral replacement in oncologic and failed revision arthroplasty patients - a retrospective cohort study

  

Overall

RG

TG

P

Patient satisfaction

 - (6-point Likert scale)

Mean (min. max)

2.7 (1–5)

3.0 (1–5)

2.5 (1–5)

p = n.s.

 - Recommendation° “no”

%

19.6%

33%*

9%*

*p < 0.05

VAS

Mean

    

 - preoperative

 

5

5

6

p = n.s.

 - postoperative

 

3

3

3

p = n.s.

SF-12

Mean ± SD

    

 - physical subdomain

 

37.9 ± 9.2

37,7 ± 9,6

38,1 ± 8,8

p = n.s.

 - mental subdomain

 

48.4 ± xx

47,2 ± 10,4

49,8 ± 12,1

p = n.s.

MSTS numerical

Mean ± SD (min – max)

17,0 ± 6,0 (3–28)

15,3 ± 5,6 (3–27)

18,7 ± 5,0 (11–28)

p = n.s. (0.056)

MSTS %

Mean

68.0%

61.2%

74.8%

 

WOMAC total

Mean ± SD

37,8 ± 19,5

47,2 ± 21,1*

30,0 ± 14,1*

*p < 0.05

 - WOMAC pain

 

4,6 ± 4,5

6,2 ± 5,5

3,3 ± 2,9

p = n.s.

 - WOMAC stiffness

 

2,1 ± 2,0

2,7 ± 2,3

1,7 ± 1,7

*p < 0.05

 - WOMAC ADL

 

31,1 ± 15,1

38,4 ± 15,7*

25,0 ± 11,8*

 

TESS

Mean ± SD (min – max)

59.5 ± 22.2 (16–115)

49.5 ± 21.9* (16–115)

67.6 ± 18.2* (37–110)

*p < 0.05

  1. RG Revision group, TG Tumor group, VAS Visual analogue scale, SF-12 Short form-12 Health-Survey, MSTS Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, TESS Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, SD Standard deviation
  2. ° ”would you recommend the treatment to relatives or friends”