First author, year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|
Andersen 2009 [35] | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Hamilton 2019 [36] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Han 2015 [37] | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Smith 2020 [38] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Warren 2018 [39] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A |
- Quality appraisal criteria [32]:
- 1) Was the sample frame appropriate to address the target population?
- 2) Were the study participants sampled in an appropriate way?
- 3) Was the sample size adequate?
- 4) Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
- 5) Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample?
- 6) Were valid methods used for the identification of the condition?
- 7) Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants?
- 8) Was there appropriate statistical analysis?
- 9) Was the response rate adequate, and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately?
- Abbreviations: N/A Not applicable