Skip to main content

Table 1 Meta-analyses and post-hoc sensitivity analysis results of physical tests in people with migraine compared to cervicogenic headache

From: Differentiating migraine, cervicogenic headache and asymptomatic individuals based on physical examination findings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Test

Procedure or location

Analysis

No. of studies

Patients with migraine

Patients with

cervicogenic headache

Mean difference (95% CI)

Heterogeneity (I2)

P for overall effect

Cervical ROM

Flexion + extension

Meta-analysis

3

69

79

13.85 [0.24, 27.45]

75%

P = 0.05

 

Sensitivity analysis (QI> 75%)

0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Rotation (sum of both sides)

Meta-analysis

3

69

79

13.88 [− 0.51, 28.27]

80%

P = 0.06

 

Sensitivity analysis (QI> 75%)

0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Lateral flexion (sum of both sides)

Meta-analysis

3

69

79

4.56 [− 0.72, 9.85]

0%

P = 0.09

 

Sensitivity analysis (QI> 75%)

0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

FRT (both sides)

Meta-analysis

2

32

43

17.67 [13.69, 21.65]

0%

P < 0.00001*

 

Sensitivity analysis (QI> 75%)

2

32

43

17.67 [13.69, 21.65]

0%

P < 0.00001*

JPE

Extension

Meta-analysis

2

43

49

0.10 [−1.41, 1.60]

0%

P = 0.09

 

Sensitivity analysis (QI> 75%)

0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Rotation

Meta-analysis

2

43

49

−0.47 [−1.28, 0.34]

0%

P = 0.26

 

Sensitivity analysis (QI> 75%)

0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Strength

Extensors

Meta-analysis

2

38

42

41.55 [10.56, 72.54]

48%

P = 0.009*

 

Sensitivity analysis (QI> 75%)

0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Flexors

Meta-analysis

2

38

42

23.81 [8.78, 38.85]

0%

P = 0.002*

 

Sensitivity analysis (QI> 75%)

0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

  1. ROM Range Of Motion, JPE joint position error, QI Quality Index, FRT Flexion-Rotation Test
  2. *Direction of effect for cervicogenic headache