Table 4 Patient Reported Outcomes Measures Administered in the Study Protocol
Measure | Abbreviation | Collection Time point | Psychometrics | Construct(s) | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome [48] | OSPRO-ROS | Baseline | Concurent Validity (pain) r = 0.31 [49] | Comorbidities, Systemic Pathology | A review-of-systems screening tool that includes constructs associated with comorbidities |
Pain Catastrophizing Scale | PCS | Baseline | Catastrophizing (rumination, magnification, helplessness) | 13-item questionnaire that assesses the degree to which individuals have different thoughts and feelings when in pain. | |
Tegner Activity Scale [52] | TEGNER | Baseline and Discharge | ICC = 0.80 MDC- 1.0 [36] | Function | Function and activity as a numerical value between 0 (complete disability) to 10 (elite athletics) |
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index [29] | SPADI | Baseline, 6 weeks, Discharge | ICC – 0.96 [30]CV (Global Disability Rating) – 0.64[32]MDC- 21.5 [30]MCID- 15.4 [31] | Pain and Function | Assess two domains; a 5-item subscale that measures pain and an 8-item subscale that measures disability |
Numeric Pain Rating Scale | NPRS | Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, Discharge | IC – 0.88 [34]Excellent Intra-rater and Interrater reliability with 100 % agreement [34]CV (VAS)- r = 0.94; 95 % CI = 0.93–0.95 [35]MCID- 2.17 [33] | Pain | 0 to 10 (11 point scale) based on pain intensity with 0/10 representing no pain and 10/10 representing the worst pain possible |
Musculoskeletal Outcome Data Evaluation Management System [46],[47]ExpectationsSurvey &Satisfaction Survey* | MODEMS-E MODEMS-S | Expectations: Enrollment, 3 weeks, 6 weeksSatisfaction:Discharge | Reliability Cohen’s kappa 0.91 [26]Internal consistency Cronbach’s alpha 0.71 [26] | Patient Expectations | Likert-based scoring tool with calculated mean score |
Global Rate of Change [53] | GROC | 3 weeks, 6 weeks, Discharge | ICC 0.9 [41]; face validity between GRC and patient ratings of the importance of change (Pearson’s r = 0.90) [42] and patient satisfaction measures (Spearman’s rho 0.56–0.70) [43] CR - Shoulder Disability Questionnaire r = 0.74) [44], NPRS (r = 0.49) [45] | Therapeutic Outcome | Global rating of change relative to baseline using a 15-point ordinal scale (where − 7 is much worse and + 7 is much better) |
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [54] | SANE | 6 months post discharge | ICC 0.84 [39]Correlation with ASES (Spearman’s Rho 0.77) [38]MCID 15 % [39] | Function | “Please rate your shoulder function on a scale of 0 % (no function) to 100 % (full, normal function)." |