Skip to main content

Table 4 Relative risk of arm pain or complaints as prevalence ratio (PR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) in the unadjusted and fully adjusted Model #5

From: The association between manual handling operations and pain in the hands and arms in the context of the 2018 BIBB/BAuA Employment Survey

Exposure of interest and covariates

Categories / Unit

Unadjusted PR (95% CI) for arm pain (Model #1)

Adjusted PR (95% CI) for arm pain (Model #5)

Manual handling operations

Often

2.773 (2.545–3.020)

1.728 (1.552–1.923)

Sometimes

1.501 (1.323–1.703)

1.162 (1.015–1.330)

Rarely

1.111 (0.956–1.291)

0.996 (0.855–1.159)

Never (ref.)

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

Manual lifting of heavy loads

Often

 

1.590 (1.420–1.781)

Sometimes

 

1.205 (1.063–1.366)

Rarely

 

1.063 (0.951–1.190)

Never (ref.)

 

1 (ref.)

Overhead work

Often

 

1.296 (1.166–1.440)

Rarely (ref.)

 

1 (ref.)

Cold; heat; wet humidity; draught

Often

 

1.657 (1.500–1.830)

Sometimes

 

1.297 (1.166–1.442)

Rarely

 

1.048 (0.925–1.188)

Never (ref.)

 

1 (ref.)

Age

Per year

 

1.020 (1.016–1.023)

Gender

Women / men (ref.)

 

1.458 (1.357–1.567)

Actual weekly working hours

Per hour

 

0.987 (0.981–0.992)

Psychosocial workload index (Kroll 2011) [26]

Per index-point

 

1.011 (1.008–1.014)

  1. The following confounder variables were included in the fully adjusted model: gender; manual lifting of heavy loads; overhead work; climate factors; age; actual weekly working hours; and an index for psychosocial workload based on Kroll (2011) [26]. The regression models include N = 14,299 subjects (complete case analysis)
  2. ref. Reference group, PR Prevalence ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval