Skip to main content

Table 4 The area under the curves (AUCs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of femoral BMD, LS-BMD and LS-TBS in total population, women, and men based on unadjusted (model 1) and age and BMI adjusted model (model 2)

From: A comparison between femoral neck and LS-BMD with LS-TBS in T2DM patients: a case control study

 

Model 1

Model 2

 

AUC

95% CI

p-value

AUC

95% CI

p-value

TOTAL

Femoral neck BMD

0.570

0.516–0.623

0.010

0.644

0.597–0.691

<0.001

LS-BMD

0.544

0.491–0.599

0.100

0.640

0.592–0.687

<0.001

LS-TBS

0.600

0.549–0.651

<0.001

0.636

0.588–0.684

<0.001

WOMEN

Femoral neck BMD

0.559

0.501–0.618

0.048

0.648

0.598–0.699

<0.001

LS-BMD

0.523

0.465–0.581

0.443

0.641

0.590–0.692

<0.001

LS-TBS

0.613

0.558–0.667

<0.001

0.642

0.591–0.693

<0.001

MEN

Femoral neck BMD

0.597

0.471–0.723

0.130

0.613

0.480–0.747

0.097

LS-BMD

0.670

0.548–0.792

0.006

0.639

0.508–0.770

0.038

LS-TBS

0.540

0.400–0.679

0.577

0.613

0.471–0.756

0.117

  1. AUC area under the curve, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, TBS trabecular bone score, BMD bone mineral density, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, LS lumbar spine