Association of global sagittal spinal deformity with functional disability two years after total hip arthroplasty

Table 3 Between-group comparisons of the pre-existence of global sagittal deformity

	T1 pelvic angle divided by pelvic incidence
	> 0.2 n = 36	≤0.2 n = 172	P value
Age (years)	74.1 ± 6.7	74.3 ± 7.1	0.653
Male (n, %)	5, 13.9	20, 11.6	0.704
Body height (cm)	154.1 ± 3.9	156.6 ± 3.3	0.021*
Body mass index (kg/m²)	24.2 ± 3.6	24.7 ± 2.9	0.548
Visual analogue scale-satisfaction (mm) ^{a, b}	76.1 ± 17.7	76.5 ± 19.4	0.999
Visual analogue scale-satisfaction (mm) ^{a, b}	27.2 ± 20.4	19.5 ± 18.3	< 0.001*
HOOS-JR ^b	46.1 ± 12.9	46.2 ± 15.2	0.773
HOOS-JR ^b	71.2 ± 11.7	84.9 ± 12.6	0.023*
EuroQol 5-Dimension ^b	0.42 ± 0.13	0.43 ± 0.12	0.564
EuroQol 5-Dimension ^b	0.66 ± 0.11	0.70 ± 0.12	0.041*

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation values or the number of hip involvements (%) as appropriate for the data type
*P < .05; represents significant between-group differences
HOOS-JR the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement
^aPatient satisfaction after THA evaluated using a 100-mm VAS for satisfaction with anchors at “0” mm (complete satisfaction) and “100” mm (complete dissatisfaction)
^bBetween-group comparisons of outcomes pre-operatively (upper row) and at the 2-year follow-up (lower row)

ISSN: 1471-2474