Skip to main content

Table 8 VAS score at 3, 6, 12, and 24-month follow-up

From: Conservative versus accelerated rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

(Year, level of evidence)

No of patients in the accelerated group (AG) and conservative group (CG)a

VAS score (mean ± standard deviation)

3-month follow-up

6-month follow-up

12-month follow-up

24-month follow-up

Jenssen et al. [73] (2018, I)

AG (60)

-

-

8.6 ± 1.8

-

CG (58)

-

-

8.7 ± 1.9

-

Keener et al. [63] (2014, I)

AG (61)

-

1.4 ± 1.6

1.1 ± 1.7

0.9 ± 1.7

CG (53)

-

1.1 ± 1.4

0.9 ± 1.2

0.6 ± 1.1

Kim et al. [64] (2012, I)

AG (56)

-

3

2.8

-

CG (49)

-

3.2

1.8

-

Klintberg et al. [72] (2009, II)

AG (7)

2.5 ± 0.5

1.2 ± 0.8

0

0.8 ± 0.9

CG (7)

2.4 ± 1.7

0.3 ± 0.5

0.9 ± 1.1

0.3 ± 0.4

Koh et al. [77] (2014, I)

AG (40)

-

2.7 ± 1.5

-

1.3 ± 1.8

CG (48)

-

2.7 ± 1.8

-

0.8 ± 1.0

Lee et al. [67] (2012, II)

AG (30)

-

-

0.9 ± 0.9

-

CG (34)

-

-

0.8 ± 0.9

-

Mazzocca et al. [68] (2017, II)

AG (31)

1.6 ± 1.4

1.0 ± 1.7

0.7 ± 1.5

-

CG (27)

2.7 ± 2.3

1.4 ± 2.3

0.9 ± 1.5

-

Raschhofer et al. [69] (2017, II)

AG (14)

1.9 ± 0.7

0.4 ± 0.4

-

-

CG (15)

2 ± 0.8

0.1 ± 0.5

-

-

Sheps et al. [78] (2015, II)

AG (97)

1.4 ± 1.6

0.8 ± 1.3

0.5 ± 0.8

0.4 ± 0.9

CG (92)

1.3 ± 1.6

0.9 ± 1.6

0.9 ± 1.7

0.5 ± 1.3

Sheps et al. [79] (2019, I)

AG (103)

1.8 ± 2.1

0.9 ± 1.3

0.6 ± 1.0

0.7 ± 1.3

CG (103)

1.4 ± 1.6

0.8 ± 1.0

0.6 ± 1.0

0.6 ± 1.3

Tirefort et al. [80] (2019, I)

AG (40)

1.9 ± 1.9

0.8 ± 1.1

-

-

CG (40)

2.6 ± 2.1

1.5 ± 1.6

-

-

  1. AG Accelerated Group, CG Conservative Group, ASES American shoulder and elbow surgeons
  2. aData are reported as number of patients unless otherwise indicated