Skip to main content

Table 7 Clinical outcomes and ROMs at 24-month follow-up

From: Conservative versus accelerated rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

(Year, level of evidence)

No of patients in the accelerated group (AG) and conservative group (CG)a

Clinical outcomes

(Mean ± standard deviation)

Range of motion

(Degrees ± standard deviation)

Constant-Murley score

Simple shoulder test

ASES score

Forward elevation

External rotation at side

Internal rotation at 90° of abduction

External rotation at 90° of abduction

Abduction

Keener et al. [63]

(2014, I)

AG (61)

83.2 ± 11.5

10.8 ± 1.8

91 ± 15.3

164 ± 13.4

62 ± 16.4

-

-

90 ± 10.3

CG (53)

84.3 ± 10.8

10.6 ± 2.5

93.3 ± 10.6

163 ± 15.8

66.2 ± 14

-

-

87.7 ± 11.9

Klintberg et al. [72] (2009, II)

AG (7)

82.3 ± 6.1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

CG (7)

75.8 ± 11.8

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Sheps et al. [78]

(2015, II)

AG (97)

-

-

-

149.9 ± 12.4

-

34.9 ± 9.7

81.5 ± 11.7

150.7 ± 20

CG (92)

-

-

-

149.9 ± 17.8

-

35.7 ± 10.2

84 ± 11.9

155.5 ± 20.2

Sheps et al. [79]

(2019, I)

AG (103)

-

-

-

155.5 ± 12.7

-

40.9 ± 12

76 ± 14.8

153.5 ± 14.6

CG (103)

-

-

-

152.2 ± 18.5

-

38.7 ± 12.4

71.5 ± 17.8

152.2 ± 21.9

  1. AG Accelerated Group, CG Conservative Group, ASES American shoulder and elbow surgeons
  2. aData are reported as number of patients unless otherwise indicated