Skip to main content

Table 5 Clinical outcomes and ROMs at 6-month follow-up

From: Conservative versus accelerated rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors
(Year, level of evidence)
No of patients in the accelerated group (AG) and conservative group (CG)a Clinical outcomes
(Mean ± standard deviation)
Range of motion
(Degrees ± standard deviation)
Constant-Murley score Simple shoulder test ASES score Forward elevation Internal rotation at side External rotation at side Internal rotation in abduction External rotation in abduction Abduction
Arndt et al. [61]
(2012, II)
AG (49) - - - 158.4 ± 22.9 - 54.3 ± 12.5 - - -
CG (43) - - - 146.4 ± 30 - 44.3 ± 19.4 - - -
Cuff et al. [70]
(2012, I)
AG (33) - - - 172 79 44 - - -
CG (35) - - - 165 60 43 - - -
Düzgün et al. [71]
(2011, II)
AG (13) - - - - - - - - -
CG (16) - - - - - - - - -
Düzgün et al. [29]
(2014, II)
AG (19) - - - 158.9 ± 1.8 88.2 ± 2.1 86.6 ± 2.4 - - 173.6 ± 3.4
CG (21) - - - 153.7 ± 4 86.5 ± 1.9 84.1 ± 2.2 - - 171 ± 3.1
Jenssen et al. [73]
(2018, I)
AG (60) 68 ± 28 - - 138 ± 25 56 ± 10 57 ± 15 - - 130 ± 33
CG (58) 71 ± 25 - - 141 ± 20 56 ± 14 59 ± 15 - - 134 ± 30
Keener et al. [63]
(2014, I)
AG (61) 74.4 ± 13.3 9.1 ± 2.7 81.1 ± 16.2 155 ± 18.1 - 61.6 ± 17.8 - - 80 ± 14.10
CG (53) 74.6 ± 11.3 9.3 ± 2.9 84.3 ± 15.1 154 ± 17.8 - 63.9 ± 15.1 - - 81.3 ± 13
Kim et al. [64]
(2012, I)
AG (56) 66.1 ± 1.7 7.8 ± 0.5 67.1 ± 3.1 150.6 ± 5.1 - 77.2 ± 3.1 - - -
CG (49) 64.5 ± 2.1 6.7 ± 0.6 69.9 ± 3.3 147.1 ± 3.5 - 72.9 ± 4.9 - - -
Klintberg et al. [72] (2009, II) AG (7) 63.5 ± 9.8 - - 138.8 ± 15.9 - - 49 ± 14.4 63.8 ± 21.6 157.75 ± 13
CG (7) 64.8 ± 18.7 - - 126.3 ± 30.3 - - 41.3 ± 7.2 70 ± 17.3 142.5 ± 37.5
Lee et al. [67]
(2012, II)
AG (30) - - - 157.3 ± 11.4 - 50.3 ± 11.2 63.8 ± 14.3 74 ± 11 165.3 ± 13.9
CG (34) - - - 151.9 ± 18.2 - 41.6 ± 14.9 47.3 ± 22.7 67.8 ± 18.1 154.4 ± 30.1
Mazzocca et al. [68] (2017, II) AG (31) 78 ± 11 10 ± 2.4 88 ± 16 173 ± 20 - 63 ± 16 - - -
CG (27) 75 ± 15 8.7 ± 3.3 80 ± 19 173 ± 10 - 61 ± 17 - - -
Raschhofer et al. [69] (2017, II) AG (14) 78.8 ± 1.4 - - - - - - - -
CG (15) 67 ± 3.5 - - - - - - - -
Sheps et al. [78]
(2015, II)
AG (97) - - - 136.3 ± 18.1 - - 32.2 ± 12.7 73.1 ± 17.3 134.6 ± 27.3
CG (92) - - - 135.9 ± 21.6 - - 32.9 ± 12 74.2 ± 17.1 139.1 ± 25.8
Sheps et al. [79]
(2019, I)
AG (103) - - - 142.3 ± 22.6 - - 35.9 ± 12.1 67.3 ± 21 139.4 ± 23.5
CG (103) - - - 141.3 ± 22.6 - - 35.5 ± 12.2 62.9 ± 21.6 139.5 ± 27.60
Tirefort et al. [80]
(2019, I)
AG (40) - - - 156.3 ± 18.8 - 39.3 ± 15.8 - - -
CG (40) - - - 153.3 ± 21.8 - 38.4 ± 20.4 - - -
aData are reported as number of patients unless otherwise indicated
AG Accelerated Group, CG Conservative Group, ASES American shoulder and elbow surgeons
  1. AG Accelerated Group, CG Conservative Group, ASES American shoulder and elbow surgeons
  2. aData are reported as number of patients unless otherwise indicated