Skip to main content

Table 3 Hip structural analysis (HSA) by presence of basicervical hip fracture after Propensity score matching

From: Comparison of hip structure analysis and grip strength between femoral neck and basicervical fractures

 

FNF (N = 19)

Basicervical HF (N = 19)

P-value

FAL (cm)

104.58 ± 7.31

101.74 ± 5.78

0.192

HAL (cm)

105.00 ± 6.18

101.95 ± 7.43

0.177

FN_CSA (cm2)

1.96 ± 0.41

1.95 ± 0.48

0.954

FN_CT (cm)

0.11 ± 0.03

0.11 ± 0.02

0.583

FN_Width (cm)

3.57 ± 0.37

3.43 ± 0.42

0.274

FN_CSMI (cm4)

1.96 ± 0.75

1.81 ± 0.97

0.595

ITN_CSA (cm2)

3.25 ± 0.83

2.86 ± 0.54

0.090

ITN_CT (cm)

0.25 ± 0.23

0.23 ± 0.04

0.171

ITN_Width (cm)

5.72 ± 0.65

5.45 ± 0.55

0.167

ITN_CSMI (cm4)

9.90 ± 4.20

7.57 ± 2.46

0.045

FS_CSA (cm2)

3.24 ± 0.72

3.02 ± 0.38

0.261

FS_CT (cm)

0.40 ± 0.08

0.38 ± 0.57

0.612

FS_Width (cm)

3.01 ± 0.32

2.91 ± 0.22

0.261

FS_CSMI (cm4)

2.99 ± 1.21

2.53 ± 0.57

0.137

  1. FNF Femur neck fracture, HF Hip fracture, FAL Femur axis length, HAL Hip axis length, CSA Cross sectional area, CT Cortical thickness, CSMI Cross sectional moment of inertia, FN Femur neck, ITN Intertrochanter, FS Femur shaft
Back to article page

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us