|
Test 1
|
Comparison
|
Test 2
|
N or N1/N2
|
p-value
|
Reference
|
|---|
|
TUAG
|
>
|
APFP
|
272/252
|
0.006**
|
As described by Glass (1996) [23]
|
|
ESST
|
>
|
APFP
|
261/252
|
0.022*
|
|
CGS
|
>
|
APFP
|
264/252
|
0.001**
|
|
FGS
|
>
|
APFP
|
264/252
|
0.024*
|
|
GPE
|
>
|
APFP
|
296/252
|
0.000***
|
|
DRI
|
>
|
APFP
|
233/252
|
0.001***
|
|
DRI
|
.
|
TUAG
|
233/272
|
0.574
|
|
DRI
|
.
|
ESST
|
233/261
|
0.322
|
|
DRI
|
.
|
CGS
|
233/264
|
0.989
|
|
DRI
|
.
|
FGS
|
233/264
|
0.308
|
|
DRI
|
.
|
GPE
|
233/296
|
0.197
|
|
TUAG
|
.
|
ESST
|
261
|
0.306
|
As described Sheshkin (2004) [24]
|
|
TUAG
|
.
|
CGS
|
263
|
0.302
|
|
TUAG
|
.
|
FGS
|
263
|
0.057
|
|
TUAG
|
.
|
GPE
|
265
|
0.193
|
|
ESST
|
.
|
CGS
|
257
|
0.071
|
|
ESST
|
.
|
FGS
|
257
|
0.469
|
|
ESST
|
<
|
GPE
|
255
|
0.033*
|
|
CGS
|
>
|
FGS
|
263
|
0.004**
|
|
CGS
|
.
|
GPE
|
257
|
0.198
|
|
FGS
|
<
|
GPE
|
257
|
0.011*
|
- Isolated Measure: Ankle Plantar Flexion Passive (APFP)
- Combined Measures: Timed up and go (TUAG), Edgren Side Step Test (ESST), comfortable and fast gait speed (CGS and FGS). PROMS: Global Perceived Effect (GPE) score and Disability Rating Index (DRI)
- Using the methods described by Glass (1996) and Sheshkin (2004) [23, 24] > indicates Test 1 has a greater correlation with time than Test 2,whereas < indicates Test 2 correlates better with time. N or N1/N2 are the sample sizes (i.e. how many correlations were used). N used paired correlations and N1/N2 used two independent sets of correlations, hence two sample sizes
