Table 1 Study Characteristics
Article First Author/Year | Country | Study Design | Retrospective or Prospective | Total Participants (n) | Mean Age (Years) | % Female | Bones Treated (Total Study) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akiyama, 2011 [9] | Japan | Case Report | Retrospective | 15 | 58.9 | 91 | Femur, Hip |
Exogen Post-Market Approval - EXOGEN Validation Report, 2019 [10] | USA | Case Series | Prospective | 158 | 61 | 93.7 | Hamate, Scaphoid, Tibia, Fibula, Ankle, Radius, Femur, Matatarsal, Clavicle, Scapula, Ulna, Humerus, Patella, Pelvis, Cuneiform, Talus |
Fujishiro, 2005 [11] | Japan | Case Report | Retrospective | 1 | 17 | 0 | Femur |
Gebauer, 2005 [12] | Germany, Austria | Case-control | Retrospective | 67 | 46 | 38.8 | Tibia, Fibula, Femur, Radius, Ulna Humerus, Metatarsal, Ankle, Scaphoid, Clavicle, Pelvis, Calcaneus, Rib, Knee |
Hemery, 2011 [13] | France | Case Series | Retrospective | 14 | 39 | 21.4 | Femur, Tibia |
Huber, 2012 [14] | Germany | Case Report | Retrospective | 1 | 19 | 0 | Phalanx |
Jingushi, 2007 [15] | Japan | Case Series | Prospective | 72 | 40.4 | 27.8 | Humerus, Radius, Ulna, Femur, Tibia |
Joshy, 2007 [16] | UK | Case Series | Retrospective | 7 | 56 | 28.6 | Tibia |
Lee, 2016 [17] | Japan | Case Report | Retrospective | 2 | 40 | 50 | Femur |
Lerner, 2004 [18] | Israel | Case Series | Retrospective | 18 | 32 | 16.7 | Femur, Tibia, Radius, Ulna, Humerus |
Lim, 2012 [19] | Malaysia | Case Report | Retrospective | 1 | 60 | 100 | Femur |
Majeed, 2019 [20] | UK | Case Series | Prospective | 47 | 56.6 | 44.7 | Tibia, Ankle, Foot |
Mayr, 2000 [21] | USA, Germany | Case Series | Retrospective, Prospective | 1359 | NR | NR | Clavicle, Humerus, Radius, Ulna, Scaphoid, Femur, Tibia, Fibula, Ankle, Calcaneus, Tarsal naviculare, Metatarsal, Foot, Other |
Mayr, 2002 [22] | Germany | Case Series | Prospective | 100 | 44 | 37 | Clavicle, Humerus, Radius, Ulna, Scaphoid, Femur, Tibia, Fibula, Other |
Mirza, 2018 [23] | UK | Case Series | Retrospective | 18 | 57.6 | 50 | Foot, Ankle |
Moghaddam, 2016 [24] | Germany | Case Series | Prospective | 19 | 43 | 5.3 | Humerus, Radius, Ulna, Femur, Tibia |
Niikura, 2016 [25] | Japan | Case Report | Retrospective | 1 | 44 | 0 | Tibia |
Nolte, 2001 [26] | Netherlands | Case Series | Retrospective | 29 | 47 | 41.4 | Tibia, Fibula, Femur, Radius, Ulna, Scaphoid, Malleolus, Clavicle, Humerus, Metatarsal |
Pigozzi, 2004 [27] | Italy | Case Series | Prospective | 15 | 35.5 | 20 | Wrist, Scaphoid, Clavicle, Talus, Femur, Tibia, Malleolus |
Povlsen, 2015 [28] | UK | Case Report | Retrospective | 1 | 75 | 100 | Ulna |
Ricardo, 2006 [29] | Cuba | RCT | Prospective | 21 | 26.7 | 0 | Scaphoid |
Romanò, 2006[30] | Italy | Case Series | Retrospective | 49 | NR | NR | NR |
Roussignol, 2012 [31] | France | Case Series | Retrospective | 60 | 43 | 36.7 | Humerus, Ulna, Radius, Metacarpal, Femur, Tibia, Fibula, Talus, Hallux, Metatarsal, Phalanx |
Rutten, 2007 [32] | Netherlands | Case Series | Prospective | 71 | 40 | 21.1 | Tibia |
Schofer, 2010 [33] | Germany | RCT | Prospective | 101 | 42.6 | 23.8 | Tibia |
Waseem, 2010 [34] | Canada | Case Report | Retrospective | 1 | 77 | 100 | Femur |
Watanabe, 2013 [35] | Japan | Case Series | Retrospective | 151 | 36.5a | 27.2 | Tibia, Fibula, Femur, Humerus, Radius, Ulna |
Welch-Phillips, 2016 [36] | Ireland | Cohort | Retrospective | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Zura, 2015 [37] | USA | Case Series | Prospective | 767 | 45.8 | 45.4 | Tibia, Femur, Radius, Ulna, Humerus, Fibula, Scaphoid, Ankle, Metatarsal, Foot |