Skip to main content

Table 2 A detailed description of the number of publications and open access publishing, depending on the knowledge of predatory journals

From: Awareness of predatory journals and open access publishing among orthopaedic and trauma surgeons – results from an online survey in Germany

 

All participants

N = 291

Knowledge of predatory journals

Yes

N = 116

No

N = 175

p-value

Is there any possibility to do research at your work place, n (%)

 Yes

227 (78,0)

108 (93,1)

119 (68,0)

< 0,001

 No

64 (22,0)

8 (6,9)

56 (32,0)

Total number of publications, n (%)

 0

48 (16,5)

13 (11,2)

35 (26,0)

< 0,001

 1

31 (10,7)

5 (4,3)

26 (14,9)

 2–5

55 (18,9)

7 (6,0)

48 (27,4)

 6–10

23 (7,9)

9 (7,8)

14 (8,0)

 11–20

33 (11,3)

15 (12,9)

18 (10,3)

  > 21

101 (34,7)

67 (57,8)

34 (14,4)

Number of publications (first/ last author), n (%)

 0

63 (21,6)

15 (12,9)

48 (27,4)

< 0,001

 1

37 (12,7)

5 (4,3)

32 (18,3)

 2–5

66 (22,7)

21 (18,1)

45 (35,7)

 6–10

25 (8,6)

9 (7,8)

16 (9,1)

 11–20

33 (11,3)

20 (17,2)

13 (7,4)

  > 21

67 (23,1)

46 (39,7)

21 (12,1)

Have you published anything in an open access journal (OA), n (%)

 Yes

118 (40,5)

74 (63,8)

44 (25,1)

< 0,001

 No

173 (59,5)

42 (36,2)

131 (74,9)

Have you heard of the “Directory of Open Access Journals” (DOAJ), n (%)

 Yes

61 (21,0)

40 (34,5)

21 (12,0)

< 0,001

 No

230 (79,0)

76 (65,5)

154 (88,0)

Are you familiar with the Think, Check and Submit approach before publishing, n (%)

 Yes

86 (29,6)

72 (62,1)

14 (8,0)

< 0,001

 No

205 (70,4)

44 (37,9)

161 (92,0)