Skip to main content

Table 2 Twelve-month prevalence of WRMSDs in musculoskeletal body regions, certainty assessment and level of evidence

From: Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among perioperative nurses: a systematic review and META-analysis

№ of studies

Certainty assessment

Effect

Certainty

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

№ of individuals

Event rate(95% CI)

Neck (follow up: 12 months; assessed with: Prevalence)

11

observational studies

not serious a

serious b

not serious c

serious d

publication bias strongly suspected e

1900

39% (29–51)

VERY LOW

Shoulder (follow up: 12 months; assessed with: Prevalence)

10

observational studies

not serious a

serious b

not serious c

not serious f

publication bias strongly suspected e

1518

44% (37–51)

LOW

Elbow (follow up: 12 months; assessed with: Prevalence)

8

observational studies

not serious a

serious b

not serious c

not serious f

publication bias strongly suspected e

1102

18% (12–26)

LOW

Hand-wrist (follow up: 12 months; assessed with: Prevalence)

10

observational studies

not serious a

serious b

not serious c

not serious f

publication bias strongly suspected e

1518

29% (20–40)

LOW

Upper-back (follow up: 12 months; assessed with: Prevalence)

8

observational studies

not serious a

serious b

not serious c

not serious f

publication bias strongly suspected e

994

34% (25–44)

LOW

Lower-back (follow up: 12 months; assessed with: Prevalence)

19

observational studies

not serious a

serious b

not serious c

not serious f

publication bias strongly suspected e

3139

62% (54–70)

LOW

Waist (follow up: 12 months; assessed with: Prevalence)

7

observational studies

not serious a

serious b

not serious c

not serious d

publication bias strongly suspected e

1020

42% (31–53)

LOW

Knee (follow up: 12 months; assessed with: Prevalence)

8

observational studies

not serious a

serious b

not serious c

not serious f

publication bias strongly suspected e

1070

47% (36–59)

LOW

Ankle-feet (follow up: 12 months; assessed with: Prevalence)

9

observational studies

not serious a

serious b

not serious c

serious d

publication bias strongly suspected e

1375

35 (22–51)

VERY LOW

  1. aStudies have a fair quality rating
  2. bI2 > 50%
  3. cThe studied population correspond to the population in study
  4. dThe effect on clinical action could differ depending on the 95% CI
  5. eFunnel and doi plot reporting major asymmetry
  6. fThe effect on clinical action not differ depending on the 95% CI