Skip to main content

Table 4 Overview of outcome assesments

From: Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol

 

T0

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

Return to work:

      

Cumulated number of sickness days (registry)

X

 

X

X

X

X

Stable RTW (registry)

  

X

X

X

X

Proportion of workers full time, part time (registry) (monthly)

X

X

X

X

X

X

Changes work and benefit status (registry) (continuous)

X

X

X

X

X

X

Work and benefit status (questionnaire)

X

X

X

X

  

Patient reported changes in work and benefit status

 

 X

X

X

  

since start of rehabilitation (questionnaire)

  

X

X

  

Economic evaluation

      

Incremental costs for an averted sick leave day from a societal perspective

   

X

  

Cost-utility analysis (CUA)

   

X

  

Modifiable factors at the clinical level

      

General health

X

X

X

X

  

Life satisfaction (SF-12)

X

X

X

X

  

Work ability

X

X

X

X

  

FABQ-Work

X

X

    

RTW self-efficacy

X

X

    

RTW expectation

X

X

X

X

  

Improvement health and function due to program

 

X

X

   

Change in self-understanding due to program

 

X

X

   

Change in self-efficacy due to program

 

X

    

Motivation for change due to program

 

X

    

Improvement work ability due to program

 

X

    

Goal-setting for RTW

 

X

X

   

Evaluation of rehabilitation program

      

Benefit from the program as a whole

 

X

    

Benefit from the program components

 

X

    

Interaction with rehabilitation team-members

 

X

    

Collaboration with stakeholders during the program

 

X

    

Planned follow-up after the program

 

X

    

What facilitates and hinder the RTW-process (qualitative)

X

X

X

X

  
  1. T0 = Enrollment; T1 = End of rehabilitation program; T2 = 6 months; T3 = 1 year; T4 = 2 years; T5 = 5 years