| T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Return to work: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Cumulated number of sickness days (registry) | X | Â | X | X | X | X |
Stable RTW (registry) | Â | Â | X | X | X | X |
Proportion of workers full time, part time (registry) (monthly) | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Changes work and benefit status (registry) (continuous) | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Work and benefit status (questionnaire) | X | X | X | X | Â | Â |
Patient reported changes in work and benefit status | Â | Â X | X | X | Â | Â |
since start of rehabilitation (questionnaire) | Â | Â | X | X | Â | Â |
Economic evaluation | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Incremental costs for an averted sick leave day from a societal perspective |  |  |  | X |  |  |
Cost-utility analysis (CUA) | Â | Â | Â | X | Â | Â |
Modifiable factors at the clinical level | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
General health | X | X | X | X | Â | Â |
Life satisfaction (SF-12) | X | X | X | X | Â | Â |
Work ability | X | X | X | X | Â | Â |
FABQ-Work | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
RTW self-efficacy | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
RTW expectation | X | X | X | X | Â | Â |
Improvement health and function due to program | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â |
Change in self-understanding due to program | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â |
Change in self-efficacy due to program | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Motivation for change due to program | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Improvement work ability due to program | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Goal-setting for RTW | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â |
Evaluation of rehabilitation program | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Benefit from the program as a whole | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Benefit from the program components | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Interaction with rehabilitation team-members | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Collaboration with stakeholders during the program | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Planned follow-up after the program | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
What facilitates and hinder the RTW-process (qualitative) | X | X | X | X | Â | Â |