Skip to main content

Table 4 Overview of outcome assesments

From: Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol

  T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
Return to work:       
Cumulated number of sickness days (registry) X   X X X X
Stable RTW (registry)    X X X X
Proportion of workers full time, part time (registry) (monthly) X X X X X X
Changes work and benefit status (registry) (continuous) X X X X X X
Work and benefit status (questionnaire) X X X X   
Patient reported changes in work and benefit status    X X X   
since start of rehabilitation (questionnaire)    X X   
Economic evaluation       
Incremental costs for an averted sick leave day from a societal perspective     X   
Cost-utility analysis (CUA)     X   
Modifiable factors at the clinical level       
General health X X X X   
Life satisfaction (SF-12) X X X X   
Work ability X X X X   
FABQ-Work X X     
RTW self-efficacy X X     
RTW expectation X X X X   
Improvement health and function due to program   X X    
Change in self-understanding due to program   X X    
Change in self-efficacy due to program   X     
Motivation for change due to program   X     
Improvement work ability due to program   X     
Goal-setting for RTW   X X    
Evaluation of rehabilitation program       
Benefit from the program as a whole   X     
Benefit from the program components   X     
Interaction with rehabilitation team-members   X     
Collaboration with stakeholders during the program   X     
Planned follow-up after the program   X     
What facilitates and hinder the RTW-process (qualitative) X X X X   
  1. T0 = Enrollment; T1 = End of rehabilitation program; T2 = 6 months; T3 = 1 year; T4 = 2 years; T5 = 5 years