Skip to main content

Table 3 Overview of questionnaire items and timing

From: Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol

Assessments

T0

T1

T2

T3

Individual factors

    

Gender, age, education, marital status, children, demanding caregiver tasks, family economy, life events

X

   

Work and benefit status

X

X

X

X

Changes in work and benefit status since start of rehabilitation

  

X

X

Subjective health complaints (SHC)

X

   

SF-12

X

X

X

X

Health and illness perceptions, cause of complaints

X

   

Physical activity

X

 

X

 

Work-related factors

    

Profession, Employment, hours of employment, working time arrangement, work tenure, type of employment (private/public, permanent/temporary), size enterprise

X

   

Experienced downsizing, concerns about the job

X

   

Accomodations at the workplace

X

   

Employer/Colleagues respect functional ability

X

   

Expected/plans for work/ work tasks after rehabilitation

X

X

  

Job involvement, work commitment

X

   

Work ability

X

X

X

X

Effort, reward imbalance (ERI)

X

   

Work autonomy, support, conflicts (QPS Nordic)

X

   

Organizational support

X

   

Job satisfaction

X

   

Planning change of employer

X

 

X

X

FABQ-Work

X

X

  

RTW self-efficacy

X

X

  

Important factors for RTW (21 items)

 

X

  

RTW expectation

X

X

X

X

Health Services

    

Evaluation of rehabilitation; improvement health and function

 

X

X

 

Evaluation of rehabilitation; change in self-understanding, increased self-efficacy, motivation for change; improvement work ability, rehabilitation team; program components, collaboration stakeholders

 

X

  

Use of health services

X

 

X

X

  1. T0 = Enrollment; T1 = End of rehabilitation program; T2 = 6 months; T3 = 12 months