Skip to main content

Table 3 Overview of questionnaire items and timing

From: Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol

Assessments T0 T1 T2 T3
Individual factors     
Gender, age, education, marital status, children, demanding caregiver tasks, family economy, life events X    
Work and benefit status X X X X
Changes in work and benefit status since start of rehabilitation    X X
Subjective health complaints (SHC) X    
SF-12 X X X X
Health and illness perceptions, cause of complaints X    
Physical activity X   X  
Work-related factors     
Profession, Employment, hours of employment, working time arrangement, work tenure, type of employment (private/public, permanent/temporary), size enterprise X    
Experienced downsizing, concerns about the job X    
Accomodations at the workplace X    
Employer/Colleagues respect functional ability X    
Expected/plans for work/ work tasks after rehabilitation X X   
Job involvement, work commitment X    
Work ability X X X X
Effort, reward imbalance (ERI) X    
Work autonomy, support, conflicts (QPS Nordic) X    
Organizational support X    
Job satisfaction X    
Planning change of employer X   X X
FABQ-Work X X   
RTW self-efficacy X X   
Important factors for RTW (21 items)   X   
RTW expectation X X X X
Health Services     
Evaluation of rehabilitation; improvement health and function   X X  
Evaluation of rehabilitation; change in self-understanding, increased self-efficacy, motivation for change; improvement work ability, rehabilitation team; program components, collaboration stakeholders   X   
Use of health services X   X X
  1. T0 = Enrollment; T1 = End of rehabilitation program; T2 = 6 months; T3 = 12 months