Skip to main content

Table 4 Effects of Sagittal Alignment Parameters on Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Disc Replacement

From: Cervical sagittal alignment after Prestige LP cervical disc replacement: radiological results and clinical impacts from a single-center experience

Variable

Non-AHO

(n = 94)

AHO

(n = 38)

P value

Non-PHO

(n = 82)

PHO

(n = 50)

P value

Postoperative

 CL (°)

16.2 ± 8.8

13.3 ± 9.1

0.087

15.2 ± 8.9

15.7 ± 9.1

0.778

 SA (°)

1.3 ± 5.4

0.7 ± 2.9

0.310

0.8 ± 4.4

1.8 ± 5.4

0.255

 SVA (mm)

15.5 ± 7.3

20.4 ± 7.7

0.003a

17.3 ± 7.6

16.2 ± 7.9

0.368

 T1s (°)

27.5 ± 7.3

27.8 ± 5.7

0.710

27.6 ± 6.8

27.5 ± 6.9

0.659

 T1s-CL (°)

11.2 ± 8.4

14.5 ± 6.5

0.014a

12.4 ± 8.0

11.8 ± 8.2

0.573

Last Follow-up

 CL (°)

12.9 ± 8.1

11.4 ± 8.6

0.439

12.4 ± 8.3

12.6 ± 8.3

0.881

 SA (°)

−2.3 ± 5.3

−2.8 ± 4.1

0.615

−3.2 ± 4.8

−1.1 ± 5.1

0.020a

 SVA (mm)

15.2 ± 5.9

20.3 ± 8.5

0.001a

17.6 ± 8.0

15.1 ± 5.0

0.032a

 T1s (°)

23.0 ± 9.8

20.4 ± 11.9

0.415

22.8 ± 11.1

21.5 ± 9.5

0.458

 T1s-CL (°)

10.1 ± 11.7

9.0 ± 13.3

0.833

10.4 ± 11.2

8.9 ± 13.7

0.940

  1. CL C2–7 lordosis, SA segmental angle, SVA sagittal vertical axis, T1s T1 slope, T1s-CL T1 slope minus C2–7 lordosis, NDI neck disability index, AHO anterior heterotopic ossification, PHO posterior heterotopic ossification
  2. aSignificant difference between two groups