Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview on patients` demographic data

From: Percutaneous versus open posterior stabilization in AOSpine type A3 thoracolumbar fractures

 

MIS

OS

 

n

%

Mean

Standard Deviation

n

%

Mean

Standard Deviation

p-value

Number of Patients

44

   

43

    

Sex

0.1676

 Male

19

43.2

  

26

60.5

   

 Female

25

56.8

  

17

39.5

   

Age (years)

44

 

43.5

14.3

43

 

48.4

12.2

0.131

BMI

44

 

24.7

4.0

43

 

27.4

4.7

0.0053

Fracture localisation

0.1728

 T11

2

4.5

  

1

2.3

   

 T12

14

31.8

  

15

34.9

   

 L1

24

54.5

  

22

51.2

   

 L2

4

9.1

  

5

11.6

   

McCormack

0.267

 3

0

0.0

  

0

0.0

   

 4

0

0.0

  

0

0.0

   

 5

13

29.5

  

6

14.0

   

 6

17

38.6

  

18

41.9

   

 7

8

18.2

  

15

34.9

   

 8

6

13.6

  

3

7.0

   

 9

0

0.0

  

0

0.0

   

Mechanism of injury

 Fall < 3 m

15

34.1

  

20

46.5

   

 Fall > 3 m

6

13.6

  

10

23.3

   

 Car

7

15.9

  

5

11.6

   

 Motorcycle

2

4.5

  

1

2.3

   

 Bicycle

    

4

9.3

   

 Pedestrian vs. car

    

1

2.3

   

 Horse riding

4

9.1

  

1

2.3

   

 Paragliding

4

9.1

       

 Skiing

6

13.6

       

 Other

    

1

2.3

   

Stabilization

 Monoaxial

39

88.6

       

 Polyaxial

4

9.1

       

 Combination

1

2.3

       

 Screw augmentation (yes)

0

0.0

  

14

32.6

   

 Implant removal (yes)

37

84.1

  

13

30.2

   

 ATS (yes)

25

56.8

  

24

55.8

   

 ATS bisegmental

0

0.0

  

10

23.3

  Â